• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野生棕煌蜂鸟中依赖情境的、对风险敏感的觅食偏好。

Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds.

作者信息

Hurly TA, Oseen MD

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge

出版信息

Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):59-66. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1130.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.1999.1130
PMID:10413541
Abstract

We tested the risk-sensitive foraging preferences of wild rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, with three types of artificial flowers. All three flower types provided the same mean volume of 30 µl of sucrose, but differed in terms of variability of the reward: constant, low variance and high variance. In trinary comparisons, subjects preferred the low-variance reward over the constant reward, and the constant reward over the high-variance reward; a result not predicted by risk-sensitive foraging theory. However, when tested with traditional binary comparisons, hummingbirds showed conventional risk-averse behaviour and selected the constant reward over the low- or high-variance rewards. This reversal of preference represents a context-dependent foraging preference. The utility of selecting intermediate levels of risk and the source of the preference reversal are discussed relative to risk-sensitive foraging theory and the effects of local context on foraging choices. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

我们用三种人造花测试了野生棕煌蜂鸟(Selasphorus rufus)对风险敏感的觅食偏好。所有三种花提供的蔗糖平均量均为30微升,但奖励的变异性不同:恒定、低方差和高方差。在三元比较中,实验对象更喜欢低方差奖励而非恒定奖励,更喜欢恒定奖励而非高方差奖励;这一结果并非风险敏感觅食理论所预测的。然而,当用传统二元比较进行测试时,蜂鸟表现出传统的风险规避行为,选择恒定奖励而非低方差或高方差奖励。这种偏好逆转代表了一种依赖情境的觅食偏好。相对于风险敏感觅食理论以及局部情境对觅食选择的影响,我们讨论了选择中等风险水平的效用以及偏好逆转的根源。版权所有1999动物行为研究协会。

相似文献

1
Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds.野生棕煌蜂鸟中依赖情境的、对风险敏感的觅食偏好。
Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):59-66. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1130.
2
Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds.棕煌蜂鸟的情境依赖型觅食决策
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 22;270(1521):1271-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2365.
3
Size is relative: use of relational concepts by wild hummingbirds.大小是相对的:野生蜂鸟使用关系概念。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;289(1971):20212508. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2508. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds.觅食蜂鸟决策过程中的个体差异。
Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt B:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
5
Estimating on the fly: The approximate number system in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus).实时估计:红腹吸蜜鸟(Selasphorus rufus)中的近似数字系统。
Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):67-75. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00448-z. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Recent advances in our understanding of risk-sensitive foraging preferences.我们对风险敏感型觅食偏好理解的最新进展。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2002 Nov;61(4):509-16. doi: 10.1079/pns2002181.
7
Wild, free-living rufous hummingbirds do not use geometric cues in a spatial task.野生的、自由生活的棕煌蜂鸟在空间任务中不使用几何线索。
Behav Processes. 2014 Oct;108:138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
8
Spatial relational learning in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus).棕煌蜂鸟(Selasphorus rufus)的空间关系学习
Anim Cogn. 2006 Jul;9(3):201-5. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0021-z. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
9
Different foraging preferences of hummingbirds on artificial and natural flowers reveal mechanisms structuring plant-pollinator interactions.蜂鸟对人造花和天然花的不同觅食偏好揭示了构建植物-传粉者相互作用的机制。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 May;84(3):655-664. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12319. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Resource use, energetic profitability, and behavioral decisions in migrant rufous hummingbirds.美洲棕煌蜂鸟迁徙中的资源利用、能量收益及行为决策
Oecologia. 1992 Apr;90(1):137-149. doi: 10.1007/BF00317819.

引用本文的文献

1
Male attractiveness is subjective to exposure to males of different attractiveness in fruit flies.雄性吸引力取决于果蝇对不同吸引力雄性的接触。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66930-0.
2
Risk sensitivity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and four chimpanzees.风险敏感性、系统发育重建与四只黑猩猩。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2234-8. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Bounded rationality in C. elegans is explained by circuit-specific normalization in chemosensory pathways.线虫的有限理性可以通过化学感觉通路中特定于回路的归一化来解释。
Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 13;10(1):3692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11715-7.
4
Principles of Economic Rationality in Mice.老鼠的经济理性原则。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17747-7.
5
Individual honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers adjust their fuel load to match variability in forage reward.单个中华蜜蜂觅食者会调整其携带的能量负载,以匹配觅食回报的变化。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 9;5:16418. doi: 10.1038/srep16418.
6
Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.恒河猴(猕猴)在知觉辨别任务中表现出诱饵效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1715-25. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0885-6.
7
Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.巴甫洛夫式奖励预测中的初始不确定性会持续提高动机显著性,并将信号追踪扩展到通常没有吸引力的线索上。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jun 1;266:119-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Natural selection can favour 'irrational' behaviour.自然选择可以偏爱“非理性”行为。
Biol Lett. 2014 Jan 15;10(1):20130935. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0935. Print 2014 Jan.
9
Optimal behaviour can violate the principle of regularity.最优行为可能违反规则原则。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 5;280(1763):20130858. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0858. Print 2013 Jul 22.
10
Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.椋鸟在延迟和奖励概率方面坚持经济合理性原则。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 6;280(1756):20122386. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2386. Print 2013 Apr 7.