Mutzbauer T S, Neubauer B, Tetzlaff K, Mueller P H
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Federal Armed Forces Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Mil Med. 1999 Jul;164(7):535-9.
This study evaluated the feasibility of using the modified semi-closed circuit underwater rebreathing system (URS) LAR VII in connection with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an expedient ventilatory adjunct in an operational setting. Fourteen combat swimmers, unfamiliar with this equipment, underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) mannequin training using these devices. Eighteen subjects, using a standard AMBU bag for ventilation, served as controls. Thirteen test persons were able to ventilate with the modified URS. Tidal volumes were significantly lower with the LAR VII/LMA than with the AMBU bag (medians, 350 vs. 800 mL). No significant difference was found in total time required for 10 CPR cycles (medians, 78 vs. 68.5 seconds). The median delay between recognition of cardiac arrest and first chest compression, however, was markedly increased with the LAR VII/LMA than with the AMBU bag (medians, 76.5 vs. 14.5 seconds). After proper training, divers might use a modified URS such as the LAR VII for CPR in connection with a LMA. Lower tidal volumes might prevent gastric inflation. Chest compression should be continued during LMA insertion.
本研究评估了在实际操作环境中,将改良的半封闭回路水下再呼吸系统(URS)LAR VII与喉罩气道(LMA)联合使用作为一种应急通气辅助设备的可行性。14名不熟悉该设备的战斗游泳者使用这些装置进行了心肺复苏(CPR)模拟训练。18名使用标准急救呼吸囊进行通气的受试者作为对照。13名测试人员能够使用改良的URS进行通气。LAR VII/LMA的潮气量显著低于急救呼吸囊(中位数分别为350和800毫升)。10个CPR周期所需的总时间未发现显著差异(中位数分别为78和68.5秒)。然而,与急救呼吸囊相比,LAR VII/LMA在识别心脏骤停与首次胸外按压之间的中位数延迟明显增加(中位数分别为76.5和14.5秒)。经过适当训练后,潜水员可能会使用改良的URS,如LAR VII,与LMA联合用于CPR。较低的潮气量可能会防止胃胀气。在插入LMA期间应继续进行胸外按压。