Poilane I, Cruaud P, Rousseau J G, Torlotin J C, Collignon A
Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1999 May;47(5):515-8.
The treatment of intestinal Clostridium difficile infections rests on administration of either a glycopeptide or metronidazole. Given the current shifts in resistance patterns of anaerobes to antimicrobials, a study of the susceptibility of C. difficile to metronidazole was timely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the culture medium on the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of metronidazole as determined using the E-test. Thirty-one strains were grown on three different media supplemented with 5% horse blood, namely Columbia agar, Wilkens Chalgren agar, and Brucella agar. Results were compared to those obtained using the reference agar dilution method (ADM). As recommended by the French Society for Microbiology, susceptibility was defined as an MIC < or = 4 mg/L. When used on strains susceptible by the ADM, the E-test yielded lower values than the ADM with all three media. Furthermore, findings suggest that E-test results obtained with strains whose MIC is in the 4 to 8 mg/L range by the ADM should be interpreted with caution and, in some cases, tested using the ADM.
肠道艰难梭菌感染的治疗依赖于给予糖肽类药物或甲硝唑。鉴于目前厌氧菌对抗菌药物耐药模式的变化,对艰难梭菌对甲硝唑敏感性的研究很及时。本研究的目的是评估培养基对采用E-test法测定的甲硝唑最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的影响。31株菌株在三种添加5%马血的不同培养基上培养,即哥伦比亚琼脂、威尔肯斯·查尔格伦琼脂和布鲁氏菌琼脂。将结果与采用参考琼脂稀释法(ADM)获得的结果进行比较。按照法国微生物学会的建议,敏感性定义为MIC≤4mg/L。当用于ADM法检测为敏感的菌株时,E-test法在所有三种培养基上得出的值均低于ADM法。此外,研究结果表明,对于ADM法检测MIC在4至8mg/L范围内的菌株,E-test法的结果应谨慎解读,在某些情况下,应采用ADM法进行检测。