Suppr超能文献

医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)和传统按服务付费(FFS)模式在使用医疗保险临终关怀福利方面是否存在差异?

Do Medicare HMOs and Medicare FFS differ in their use of the Medicare hospice benefit?

作者信息

Virnig B A, Persily N A, Morgan R O, DeVito C A

机构信息

University of Miami School of Medicine, FL, USA.

出版信息

Hosp J. 1999;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/0742-969x.1999.11882910.

Abstract

This study compares use of the hospice benefit in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare risk-health maintenance organization (HMO) options in South Florida in 1992. A higher percentage of deaths occurred in hospice in the HMO option than in the FFS option. Compared to individuals in the FFS option, HMO-enrolled hospice users had longer lengths of hospice stay, lower 7-day mortality and higher 180-day (6 month) survival. These differences are consistent with the physician's financial incentives associated with the two programs.

摘要

本研究比较了1992年南佛罗里达州医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)模式和医疗保险风险健康维护组织(HMO)模式下临终关怀福利的使用情况。HMO模式下临终关怀机构中的死亡比例高于FFS模式。与FFS模式下的个体相比,参加HMO的临终关怀使用者的临终关怀住院时间更长,7天死亡率更低,180天(6个月)生存率更高。这些差异与两个项目中医生的经济激励措施一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验