• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科学生使用不锈钢K锉和镍钛手动锉进行根管治疗的牙髓病并发症

Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.

作者信息

Pettiette M T, Metzger Z, Phillips C, Trope M

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 1999 Apr;25(4):230-34. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80148-4.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80148-4
PMID:10425945
Abstract

Straightening of curved canals is one of the most common procedural errors in endodontic instrumentation. This problem is commonly encountered when dental students perform molar endodontics. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the type of instrument used by these students on the extent of straightening and on the incidence of other endodontic procedural errors. Nickel-titanium 0.02 taper hand files were compared with traditional stainless-steel 0.02 taper K-files. Sixty molar teeth comprised of maxillary and mandibular first and second molars were treated by senior dental students. Instrumentation was with either nickel-titanium hand files or stainless-steel K-files. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of each tooth were taken using an XCP precision instrument with a customized bite block to ensure accurate reproduction of radiographic angulation. The radiographs were scanned and the images stored as TIFF files. By superimposing tracings from the preoperative over the postoperative radiographs, the degree of deviation of the apical third of the root canal filling from the original canal was measured. The presence of other errors, such as strip perforation and instrument breakage, was established by examining the radiographs. In curved canals instrumented by stainless-steel K-files, the average deviation of the apical third of the canals was 14.44 degrees (+/- 10.33 degrees). The deviation was significantly reduced when nickel-titanium hand files were used to an average of 4.39 degrees (+/- 4.53 degrees). The incidence of other procedural errors was also significantly reduced by the use of nickel-titanium hand files.

摘要

弯曲根管的拉直是牙髓治疗器械操作中最常见的程序性错误之一。牙科学生在进行磨牙牙髓治疗时经常遇到这个问题。本研究的目的是比较这些学生使用的器械类型对根管拉直程度和其他牙髓治疗程序性错误发生率的影响。将镍钛0.02锥度手动锉与传统的不锈钢0.02锥度K锉进行比较。60颗磨牙,包括上颌和下颌第一、第二磨牙,由高年级牙科学生进行治疗。使用镍钛手动锉或不锈钢K锉进行器械操作。使用带有定制咬块的XCP精密器械对每颗牙齿进行术前和术后X光片拍摄,以确保X光片角度的准确再现。X光片被扫描,图像存储为TIFF文件。通过将术前的描图叠加在术后X光片上,测量根管充填根尖三分之一处相对于原始根管的偏差程度。通过检查X光片确定是否存在其他错误,如牙本质侧穿和器械折断。在使用不锈钢K锉进行器械操作的弯曲根管中,根管根尖三分之一处的平均偏差为14.44度(±10.33度)。当使用镍钛手动锉时,偏差显著降低,平均为4.39度(±4.53度)。使用镍钛手动锉也显著降低了其他程序性错误的发生率。

相似文献

1
Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.牙科学生使用不锈钢K锉和镍钛手动锉进行根管治疗的牙髓病并发症
J Endod. 1999 Apr;25(4):230-34. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80148-4.
2
Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.手持不锈钢K锉与旋转镍钛0.04锥度锉的比较。
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;28(6):421-6.
3
Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by senior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique'.对使用“八步法”与“逐步后退技术”的高年级牙科学生在患者根管预备过程中出现的操作失误进行比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Jun;97(6):745-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.12.039.
4
Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.旋转镍钛K3器械与不锈钢手动K-Flex锉的效率比较。第2部分。拔除牙齿严重弯曲根管的清洁效果和成形能力。
Int Endod J. 2003 Mar;36(3):208-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00644.x.
5
Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.两种旋转镍钛系统与不锈钢手动器械相比的根管预备离体研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Jan;42(1):22-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01489.x.
6
A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.新手操作者对根管进行预备时,镍钛旋转GT锉与传统器械的计算机断层扫描重建对比。
Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):476-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x.
7
Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.对学生使用不锈钢K锉和镍钛手动锉进行根管治疗成功率的评估。
J Endod. 2001 Feb;27(2):124-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200102000-00017.
8
Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.在土耳其的牙科学前教育中使用旋转镍钛锉进行根管成形。
J Dent Educ. 2012 Apr;76(4):509-13.
9
Shaping of curved root canals instrumented with stainless steel and nickel titanium files.使用不锈钢锉和镍钛锉预备弯曲根管的塑形
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2005;18(1):23-30.
10
A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments.镍钛器械与不锈钢器械根管预备的比较。
J Endod. 1995 Apr;21(4):173-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Rotary and Hand File Systems in Terms of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time among Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.旋转锉系统与手动锉系统在乳牙根管充填质量和操作时间方面有效性的比较评价:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):962-969. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2950.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Rotary Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Files After Autoclaving: An Atomic Force Microscopic Study.高压灭菌后不同旋转镍钛(NiTi)锉表面粗糙度的比较评估:一项原子力显微镜研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 3;16(8):e66054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66054. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Fracture Strength of Tooth Roots Following Canal Preparation by Three Rotary File Systems: An In Vitro Study.
三种旋转锉系统根管预备后牙根的抗折强度:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57302. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Effect of NaOCl and EDTA irrigating solutions on the cyclic fatigue resistance of EdgeTaper Platinum instruments.次氯酸钠和乙二胺四乙酸冲洗液对 EdgeTaper Platinum 根管锉循环疲劳强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 22;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02215-0.
5
Significance of Endodontic Case Difficulty Assessment: A Retrospective Study.牙髓病例难度评估的意义:一项回顾性研究。
Int Dent J. 2022 Oct;72(5):648-653. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
6
A Literature Review of Minimally Invasive Endodontic Access Cavities - Past, Present and Future.微创牙髓腔入路的文献回顾——过去、现在和未来。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Mar;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.62681.
7
Adoption of change in endodontic practice after an educational program: A qualitative study.教育项目后牙髓病治疗实践改变的采纳:一项定性研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Jun;8(3):781-792. doi: 10.1002/cre2.542. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
The analysis of root canal curvature and direction of maxillary lateral incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study.上颌侧切牙根管弯曲度和方向的锥形束 CT 分析:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 7;101(1):e28393. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028393.
9
Occurrence and risk factors of dental root perforations: a systematic review.牙根穿孔的发生率及危险因素:一项系统评价
Int Dent J. 2020 Aug 20;71(2):96-105. doi: 10.1111/idj.12602.
10
Comparison of Dentinal Wall Thickness in the Furcation Area (Danger Zone) in the First and Second Mesiobuccal Canals in the Maxillary First and Second Molars Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较上颌第一和第二磨牙的第一和第二近中颊根管分叉区(危险区)的牙本质壁厚度。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Apr 24;5(2):81-85. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.18189. eCollection 2020.