Gala Urvi P, Kalaskar Ritesh, Vinay Vineet, Joshi Suyash, Doiphode Avani R
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):962-969. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2950.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to answer the following focused question: Are rotary file systems more effective than hand file systems in terms of the quality of obturation and instrumentation time among primary teeth?
The inclusion criteria comprised studies that compared the effect on quality of obturation and instrumentation time among primary teeth after using rotary and hand file systems for biomechanical preparation of the root canals.
This review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The searched databases included Medline ( PubMed), EBSCO, and Google Scholar. Articles published from January 2000 to December 2021, but only in English, were included.
The search resulted in 8,003 published studies. After the removal of duplicate studies and full-text analysis, 9 studies were selected for systematic review, and 8 were selected for meta-analysis. Overall, the results demonstrated the promising effects of rotary file systems in reducing instrumentation time and improving obturation quality compared to hand files.
Within the limitations of this review, it can be asserted that rotary file systems are superior to hand files in primary teeth for pulpectomy procedures.
Rotary files, a more recent technique, are more efficient than traditional hand files in lowering the time required for instrumentation. Additionally, they provide superior obturation quality in primary molars, making them particularly beneficial for pediatric patients.
Gala UP, Kalaskar R, Vinay V, Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Rotary and Hand File Systems in Terms of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time among Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):962-969.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在回答以下重点问题:在乳牙根管充填质量和预备时间方面,旋转锉系统是否比手动锉系统更有效?
研究入选标准、参与者和干预措施:纳入标准包括比较使用旋转锉系统和手动锉系统对乳牙根管进行生物力学预备后,根管充填质量和预备时间的影响的研究。
本评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。检索的数据库包括Medline(PubMed)、EBSCO和谷歌学术。纳入2000年1月至2021年12月发表的文章,但仅限英文。
检索得到8003项已发表研究。在去除重复研究和进行全文分析后,选择9项研究进行系统评价,8项研究进行荟萃分析。总体而言,结果表明与手动锉相比,旋转锉系统在减少预备时间和提高充填质量方面具有显著效果。
在本评价的局限性范围内,可以断言在乳牙牙髓摘除术中,旋转锉系统优于手动锉。
旋转锉作为一种较新的技术,在缩短预备所需时间方面比传统手动锉更有效。此外,它们在乳牙磨牙中提供了更好的充填质量,对儿科患者特别有益。
Gala UP, Kalaskar R, Vinay V, 乳牙根管充填质量和预备时间方面旋转锉系统与手动锉系统有效性的比较评价:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(8):962 - 969。