Pernerstorfer T, Schmid R, Bieglmayer C, Eichler H G, Kapiotis S, Jilma B
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, TARGET, Vienna University Hospital School of Medicine, Austria.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jul;66(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70053-6.
To compare the antipyretic efficacy of aspirin and acetaminophen (INN, paracetamol) in 30 male volunteers with the use of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) to elicit a standardized febrile response.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in parallel groups. Subjects received an intravenous endotoxin bolus of 4 ng/kg after premedication with either placebo, 1000 mg aspirin, or 1000 mg acetaminophen by mouth.
Peak body temperatures were 38.5 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the placebo group, 37.6 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the acetaminophen group (P = .001 versus placebo), and 38.6 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the subjects treated with aspirin (P = .001 versus acetaminophen; P = .570 versus placebo) at 4 hours after lipopolysaccharide infusion. Subjective symptom scores for chills and perception of fever were higher in the placebo group than in the acetaminophen group (chills, 2.5 +/- 0.3 versus 1.0 +/- 0.2, P = .009 and fever, 2.5 +/- 0.2 versus 2.0 +/- 0.2, P = .021). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 levels rose by several orders of magnitude (P < .001 versus baseline in all groups), without significant intergroup differences.
Acetaminophen was the superior antipyretic drug in endotoxemia compared with aspirin. Treatment with acetaminophen ameliorates subjective symptoms induced by endotoxemia without compromising the humoral response of a subject to endotoxin. This observation has clinical interest and may also help to improve the lipopolysaccharide model, which can be used to test anti-inflammatory and anticoagulatory drugs.
在30名男性志愿者中,通过使用内毒素(脂多糖)引发标准化发热反应,比较阿司匹林和对乙酰氨基酚(国际非专利药品名称,扑热息痛)的退热效果。
采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,设置平行组。受试者在口服安慰剂、1000毫克阿司匹林或1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚进行预处理后,静脉注射4纳克/千克的内毒素大剂量。
脂多糖输注后4小时,安慰剂组的最高体温为38.5℃±0.2℃,对乙酰氨基酚组为37.6℃±0.2℃(与安慰剂相比,P = 0.001),阿司匹林治疗组为38.6℃±0.2℃(与对乙酰氨基酚相比,P = 0.001;与安慰剂相比,P = 0.570)。安慰剂组寒战和发热感知的主观症状评分高于对乙酰氨基酚组(寒战,2.5±0.3对1.0±0.2,P = 0.009;发热,2.5±0.2对2.0±0.2,P = 0.021)。肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-6和白细胞介素-8水平升高了几个数量级(与所有组的基线相比,P < 0.001),组间无显著差异。
与阿司匹林相比,对乙酰氨基酚是内毒素血症中更优的退热药。对乙酰氨基酚治疗可改善内毒素血症引起的主观症状,而不影响受试者对内毒素的体液反应。这一观察结果具有临床意义,也可能有助于改进可用于测试抗炎和抗凝药物的脂多糖模型。