Suppr超能文献

对乙酰氨基酚在内毒素血症中比阿司匹林具有更强的解热效力:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Acetaminophen has greater antipyretic efficacy than aspirin in endotoxemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Pernerstorfer T, Schmid R, Bieglmayer C, Eichler H G, Kapiotis S, Jilma B

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, TARGET, Vienna University Hospital School of Medicine, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jul;66(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70053-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antipyretic efficacy of aspirin and acetaminophen (INN, paracetamol) in 30 male volunteers with the use of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) to elicit a standardized febrile response.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in parallel groups. Subjects received an intravenous endotoxin bolus of 4 ng/kg after premedication with either placebo, 1000 mg aspirin, or 1000 mg acetaminophen by mouth.

RESULTS

Peak body temperatures were 38.5 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the placebo group, 37.6 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the acetaminophen group (P = .001 versus placebo), and 38.6 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the subjects treated with aspirin (P = .001 versus acetaminophen; P = .570 versus placebo) at 4 hours after lipopolysaccharide infusion. Subjective symptom scores for chills and perception of fever were higher in the placebo group than in the acetaminophen group (chills, 2.5 +/- 0.3 versus 1.0 +/- 0.2, P = .009 and fever, 2.5 +/- 0.2 versus 2.0 +/- 0.2, P = .021). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 levels rose by several orders of magnitude (P < .001 versus baseline in all groups), without significant intergroup differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetaminophen was the superior antipyretic drug in endotoxemia compared with aspirin. Treatment with acetaminophen ameliorates subjective symptoms induced by endotoxemia without compromising the humoral response of a subject to endotoxin. This observation has clinical interest and may also help to improve the lipopolysaccharide model, which can be used to test anti-inflammatory and anticoagulatory drugs.

摘要

目的

在30名男性志愿者中,通过使用内毒素(脂多糖)引发标准化发热反应,比较阿司匹林和对乙酰氨基酚(国际非专利药品名称,扑热息痛)的退热效果。

方法

采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,设置平行组。受试者在口服安慰剂、1000毫克阿司匹林或1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚进行预处理后,静脉注射4纳克/千克的内毒素大剂量。

结果

脂多糖输注后4小时,安慰剂组的最高体温为38.5℃±0.2℃,对乙酰氨基酚组为37.6℃±0.2℃(与安慰剂相比,P = 0.001),阿司匹林治疗组为38.6℃±0.2℃(与对乙酰氨基酚相比,P = 0.001;与安慰剂相比,P = 0.570)。安慰剂组寒战和发热感知的主观症状评分高于对乙酰氨基酚组(寒战,2.5±0.3对1.0±0.2,P = 0.009;发热,2.5±0.2对2.0±0.2,P = 0.021)。肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-6和白细胞介素-8水平升高了几个数量级(与所有组的基线相比,P < 0.001),组间无显著差异。

结论

与阿司匹林相比,对乙酰氨基酚是内毒素血症中更优的退热药。对乙酰氨基酚治疗可改善内毒素血症引起的主观症状,而不影响受试者对内毒素的体液反应。这一观察结果具有临床意义,也可能有助于改进可用于测试抗炎和抗凝药物的脂多糖模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验