Goldstein Jerome, Silberstein Stephen D, Saper Joel R, Ryan Robert E, Lipton Richard B
San Francisco Headache Clinic, CA 94109, USA.
Headache. 2006 Mar;46(3):444-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00376.x.
Compare the effectiveness of a combination analgesic containing acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine to that of ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine.
Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. A total of 1555 migraineurs were included in the analysis. No patients were excluded solely because of severity of symptoms or degree of disability. A single 2-tablet dose for each of the 3 treatment groups: a combination product containing acetaminophen 250 mg, aspirin 250 mg, and caffeine 65 mg per tablet (AAC); ibuprofen 200 mg per tablet (IB); or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the weighted sum of pain relief (PAR) scores at 2 hours postdose (TOTPAR2) and an important secondary endpoint was the time to onset of meaningful relief.
There were 669 patients in the AAC group, 666 patients in the IB group, and 220 patients in the placebo group. The 3 treatment groups had similar demographic profiles, migraine histories, and baseline symptom profiles. While both active treatments were significantly better than placebo in relieving the pain and associated symptoms of migraine, AAC was superior to IB for TOTPAR2, as well as for PAR, time to onset of meaningful PAR, pain intensity reduction, headache response, and pain free. The mean TOTPAR2 scores for AAC, IB, and placebo were 2.7, 2.4, and 2.0, respectively (AAC vs. IB, P < .03). The median time to meaningful PAR for AAC was 20 minutes earlier than that of IB (P < .036).
AAC and IB are safe, cost-effective treatments for migraine; AAC provides significantly superior efficacy and speed of onset compared with IB.
比较含对乙酰氨基酚、阿司匹林和咖啡因的复方镇痛药与布洛芬治疗偏头痛的效果。
多中心、双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照单剂量研究。共1555名偏头痛患者纳入分析。没有患者仅因症状严重程度或残疾程度而被排除。3个治疗组每组服用1次2片剂量的药物:一种复方制剂,每片含对乙酰氨基酚250mg、阿司匹林250mg和咖啡因65mg(AAC);每片含布洛芬200mg(IB);或匹配的安慰剂。主要疗效终点是给药后2小时疼痛缓解(PAR)评分的加权总和(TOTPAR2),一个重要的次要终点是出现有意义缓解的时间。
AAC组有669例患者,IB组有666例患者,安慰剂组有220例患者。3个治疗组在人口统计学特征、偏头痛病史和基线症状方面相似。虽然两种活性治疗在缓解偏头痛的疼痛及相关症状方面均显著优于安慰剂,但在TOTPAR2以及PAR、出现有意义PAR的时间、疼痛强度降低、头痛反应和无疼痛方面,AAC优于IB。AAC、IB和安慰剂的平均TOTPAR2评分分别为2.7、2.4和2.0(AAC与IB比较,P<0.03)。AAC出现有意义PAR的中位时间比IB早20分钟(P<0.036)。
AAC和IB是治疗偏头痛安全且经济有效的方法;与IB相比,AAC疗效显著更优且起效更快。