Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆囊切除术候选者术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影的拟议标准。

Proposed criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Barr L L, Frame B C, Coulanjon A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, 1945 Boston, SE, Suite 303, Grand Rapids, MI 49506, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1999 Aug;13(8):778-81. doi: 10.1007/s004649901097.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms (ERC) performed on patients who are candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The majority of these procedures result in normal findings. This study is an attempt to determine useful clinical criteria and strategy for predicting the presence or absence of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and the need for ERC in patients who are candidates for LC.

METHODS

The observational portion of this study explored laboratory and ultrasound data from 134 consecutive patients who had undergone preoperative ERC, followed by LC, over a 4-year period. The data were then analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to determine the best models for predicting the presence or absence of stones in the common bile duct. Models using gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phophatase (AP), common bile duct diameter (CBDIA), and amylase (AMY) were then evaluated retrospectively in 36 additional patients (validation group).

RESULTS

A model based on GGT and common bile duct diameter as positive predictors and amylase as a negative predictor correctly classified 78% of the patients in the validation group. This model resulted in a negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.88, 0.68, 0.87, and 0.71, respectively. The model utilizing AP was almost as effective. This model resulted in a NPV, PPV, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.83, 0.67, 0.80, and 0.71, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a number of laboratory values and imaging techniques correlate with the presence or absence of CBDS, our study confirms that individually they have poor predictive value. Our data and models suggest that elevated serum amylase is a negative predictor for CBDS. Elevated GGT and/or AP with widened CBDIA and normal AMY strongly suggest the presence of CBDS and the need for preoperative ERC. Elevated GGT, AP, or widened CBDIA with elevated amylase, in the absence of clinical pancreatitis, may suggest that small stones have passed through the ampulla of Vater and that the CBD is generally cleared of stones.

摘要

背景

对于适合行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者,内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)的数量急剧增加。这些检查大多数结果正常。本研究旨在确定有用的临床标准和策略,以预测适合行LC的患者是否存在胆总管结石(CBDS)以及是否需要进行ERC。

方法

本研究的观察部分探讨了134例连续患者的实验室和超声数据,这些患者在4年期间接受了术前ERC,随后进行了LC。然后通过多因素逻辑回归分析数据,以确定预测胆总管结石存在与否的最佳模型。然后在另外36例患者(验证组)中回顾性评估使用γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(AP)、胆总管直径(CBDIA)和淀粉酶(AMY)的模型。

结果

基于GGT和胆总管直径作为阳性预测指标以及淀粉酶作为阴性预测指标的模型在验证组中正确分类了78%的患者。该模型的阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)、敏感性和特异性分别为0.88、0.68、0.87和0.71。利用AP的模型几乎同样有效。该模型的NPV、PPV、敏感性和特异性分别为0.83、0.67、0.80和0.71。

结论

虽然一些实验室值和影像学技术与CBDS的存在与否相关,但我们的研究证实,单独来看它们的预测价值较差。我们的数据和模型表明,血清淀粉酶升高是CBDS的阴性预测指标。GGT和/或AP升高且CBDIA增宽以及AMY正常强烈提示存在CBDS且需要术前ERC。在没有临床胰腺炎的情况下,GGT、AP升高或CBDIA增宽且淀粉酶升高,可能提示小结石已通过Vater壶腹,胆总管一般已无结石。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验