Smith A I, Royston C M, Sedman P C
Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Rd Hull, HU3 2JZ, Brough W, Rate A, Deans GT, and Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, Australia.
Surg Endosc. 1999 Aug;13(8):804-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649901104.
Controversy exists regarding whether it is necessary to secure the mesh prosthesis during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, or port-site hernia.
We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing stapled with nonstapled laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs in a series of 502 consecutive patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair at two institutions between January 1995 and March 1997.
In all, 263 nonstapled and 273 stapled repairs were performed in 502 patients. Patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1-32 months) by independent surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recurrence (0 to 263 nonstapled, 3 to 273 stapled; chi-square p = 0.09). The overall recurrence rate was 0.6%. There was no significant difference in operative time, port-site hernia, chronic pain or neuralgia between the two groups.
It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair, allowing a reduction in the size of the ports.
关于在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中是否有必要固定补片假体存在争议。尚不清楚缝合补片是否会影响复发率、神经痛发生率或切口疝发生率。
我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较了1995年1月至1997年3月期间在两家机构接受择期腹股沟疝修补术的502例连续患者中,腹腔镜TAPP腹股沟疝修补术使用缝合补片与未缝合补片的情况。
502例患者中,共进行了263例未缝合补片和273例缝合补片的修补术。由独立外科医生对患者进行评估,中位随访时间为16个月(范围1 - 32个月)。复发率无统计学差异(未缝合补片组263例中有0例复发,缝合补片组273例中有3例复发;卡方检验p = 0.09)。总体复发率为0.6%。两组在手术时间、切口疝、慢性疼痛或神经痛方面无显著差异。
在腹腔镜TAPP腹股沟疝修补术中无需固定补片,这样可减小切口尺寸。