• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手部清洁制剂清除污染手部鲍曼不动杆菌菌株的有效性。

Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands.

作者信息

Cardoso C L, Pereira H H, Zequim J C, Guilhermetti M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Analyses, Laboratory of Microbiology, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1999 Aug;27(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70052-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70052-0
PMID:10433671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents (plain liquid soap, 70% ethyl alcohol, 10% povidone-iodine, and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate) for removing a hospital strain of Acinetobacter baumannii from artificially contaminated hands of 5 volunteers was studied.

METHODS

The experiments were performed by using a Latin square statistical design, with two 5 x 4 randomized blocks, and the results were estimated by ANOVA. In the first and second blocks, the fingertips of the volunteers were contaminated with approximately 10(3) colony-forming units (light contamination hand) and 10(6) colony-forming units (heavy contamination hand), respectively.

RESULTS

In the first block, all products tested were effective, almost completely removing the microbial population of A baumannii artificially applied to the hands. In the second block, the use of hand-cleansing agents resulted in 91.36% (4% chlorhexidine), 92.33% (liquid soap), 98.49% (10% povidone-iodine), and 98.93% (70% ethyl alcohol) reduction in counts of A baumannii cells applied to the fingertips. The ethyl alcohol and povidone-iodine had significantly higher removal rates than plain soap and chlorhexidine (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 70% ethyl alcohol and 10% povidone-iodine may be the most effective hand-cleansing agents for removing A baumannii strain from heavily contaminated hands (10(6) colony-forming units/fingertip).

摘要

背景

研究了手部清洁制剂(普通液体肥皂、70%乙醇、10%聚维酮碘和4%葡萄糖酸氯己定)对5名志愿者人工污染手部的医院鲍曼不动杆菌菌株的清除效果。

方法

实验采用拉丁方统计设计,有两个5×4随机区组,结果通过方差分析进行评估。在第一个和第二个区组中,志愿者的指尖分别被约10³菌落形成单位(轻度污染手)和10⁶菌落形成单位(重度污染手)污染。

结果

在第一个区组中,所有测试产品均有效,几乎完全清除了人工接种到手上的鲍曼不动杆菌微生物群落。在第二个区组中,使用手部清洁制剂后,接种到指尖的鲍曼不动杆菌细胞计数减少了91.36%(4%葡萄糖酸氯己定)、92.33%(液体肥皂)、98.49%(10%聚维酮碘)和98.93%(70%乙醇)。乙醇和聚维酮碘的清除率明显高于普通肥皂和氯己定(P<.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,70%乙醇和10%聚维酮碘可能是从重度污染手部(10⁶菌落形成单位/指尖)清除鲍曼不动杆菌菌株最有效的手部清洁制剂。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands.手部清洁制剂清除污染手部鲍曼不动杆菌菌株的有效性。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Aug;27(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70052-0.
2
Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands.手部清洁制剂从污染的手上清除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的有效性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):105-8. doi: 10.1086/501872.
3
Comparative effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from experimentally contaminated fingertips.
Am J Infect Control. 1994 Aug;22(4):224-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)99000-x.
4
[Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].[洗手后不同防腐剂抗菌效果的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2004 Jan-Apr;38(1-2):137-43.
5
Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.使用肥皂和水进行手部卫生清洁,在去除艰难梭菌方面优于使用酒精擦手液和消毒湿巾。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):939-44. doi: 10.1086/605322.
6
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.聚维酮碘、聚维酮碘 - 乙醇及葡萄糖酸氯己定 - 乙醇外科洗手剂抗菌效果的比较
Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
7
Effectiveness of liquid soap vs. chlorhexidine gluconate for the removal of Clostridium difficile from bare hands and gloved hands.液体肥皂与葡萄糖酸洗必泰用于去除裸手和戴手套手上艰难梭菌的效果比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;15(11):697-702. doi: 10.1086/646840.
8
Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands.用于从受污染的手上清除萎缩芽孢杆菌(炭疽芽孢杆菌的替代菌)的特定手部卫生剂的功效。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1274-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1274.
9
Antiseptic Effect of Conventional Povidone-Iodine Scrub, Chlorhexidine Scrub, and Waterless Hand Rub in a Surgical Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial.手术室中常规聚维酮碘擦洗、氯己定擦洗和免洗洗手液的抗菌效果:一项随机对照试验
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.296. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
Influence of rings on the efficacy of hand sanitization and residual bacterial contamination.戒指对手部消毒效果及细菌残留污染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):351-3. doi: 10.1086/510790. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility in biofilm-forming Acinetobacter baumannii: A focus on environmental isolates.生物膜形成鲍曼不动杆菌对抗生素和消毒剂的敏感性特征:聚焦于环境分离株
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2024 Mar 5;14(2):126-133. doi: 10.1556/1886.2024.00014. Print 2024 May 14.
2
Complex formation of potassium salt of highly fatty acid with hemagglutinin protein in influenza virus via exothermic interaction.高脂肪酸钾盐与流感病毒中的血凝素蛋白通过放热相互作用形成复合物。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022 Jun 25;31:101302. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101302. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of Commercial Hand Sanitizers Against Human Norovirus Evaluated by an Fingerpad Method.
通过指垫法对商用洗手液抗人诺如病毒功效的比较评估
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 7;13:869087. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.869087. eCollection 2022.
4
Control and management of multidrug resistant : A review of the evidence and proposal of novel approaches.多重耐药的控制与管理:证据综述及新方法建议
Infect Prev Pract. 2020 Jul 19;2(3):100077. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100077. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Hand Disinfection Potential of Hand Sanitizer and Liquid Soap among Dental Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.牙科学生中洗手液和液体肥皂手部消毒潜力的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 May;24(5):336-339. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23420.
6
Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study.聚维酮碘和葡萄糖酸氯己定清洁剂在体内手部卫生临床模拟研究中的杀菌和杀病毒活性
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Jun;7(2):235-247. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0202-5. Epub 2018 May 14.
7
In vitro evaluation of the susceptibility of isolates to antiseptics and disinfectants: comparison between clinical and environmental isolates.分离株对防腐剂和消毒剂敏感性的体外评估:临床分离株与环境分离株的比较。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Apr 11;6:36. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0195-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Antibiotic-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Increasing Success Remains a Challenge as a Nosocomial Pathogen.作为一种医院病原体,耐抗生素鲍曼不动杆菌感染成功率不断上升,仍是一项挑战。
J Pathog. 2016;2016:7318075. doi: 10.1155/2016/7318075. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.epic3:英格兰国民保健署医院内医源性感染预防的国家循证指南。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2.
10
Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation.聚维酮碘:用于手部消毒、皮肤准备及防腐冲洗。
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(3):376-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00405.x.