• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from experimentally contaminated fingertips.

作者信息

Huang Y, Oie S, Kamiya A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1994 Aug;22(4):224-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)99000-x.

DOI:10.1016/0196-6553(94)99000-x
PMID:7985822
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Five subjects participated in a study of optimal conditions for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated fingertips.

METHODS

Fingertips were contaminated experimentally and cleaned by various methods. Bacterial removal was measured as percentage and is given as mean +/- standard error of the mean.

RESULTS

Rinsing the fingertips with tap water for 20 seconds and drying them with paper towels removed 95.2% +/- 1.6% of the contamination. Application of hand-cleansing agents to fingertips for 20 seconds, followed by a 20-second tap-water rinse and towel drying, removed bacteria as follows: povidone-iodine detergent, 99.2% +/- 0.4%; chlorhexidine detergent, 97.2% +/- 0.8%; and liquid soap, 96.1% +/- 1.1%. In a modification of the method, 80% ethyl alcohol applied to the fingertips for 20 seconds, followed by air drying for 40 seconds, removed 99.1% +/- 0.8% of the bacteria. Statistical analyses indicated that povidone-iodine and 80% ethyl alcohol were more effective than the other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Rinsing contaminated fingertips with tap water and towel drying them is sufficient to reduce contamination with methicillin-resistant S. aureus by 95%. Washing with povidone-iodine or 80% ethyl alcohol further reduces contamination by an additional 99%.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from experimentally contaminated fingertips.
Am J Infect Control. 1994 Aug;22(4):224-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)99000-x.
2
Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands.手部清洁制剂从污染的手上清除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的有效性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):105-8. doi: 10.1086/501872.
3
Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands.手部清洁制剂清除污染手部鲍曼不动杆菌菌株的有效性。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Aug;27(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70052-0.
4
[Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].[洗手后不同防腐剂抗菌效果的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2004 Jan-Apr;38(1-2):137-43.
5
Comparison of 3 alcohol gels and 70% ethyl alcohol for hand hygiene.3种酒精凝胶与70%乙醇用于手部卫生的比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29(10):960-2. doi: 10.1086/591092.
6
Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands.用于从受污染的手上清除萎缩芽孢杆菌(炭疽芽孢杆菌的替代菌)的特定手部卫生剂的功效。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1274-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1274.
7
[A study of resistance to antiseptics of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in gastroenterological surgery].[胃肠外科中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对抗菌剂耐药性的研究]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Feb;92(2):113-7.
8
Hand washing rituals in trauma theatre: clean or dirty?创伤手术室中的洗手规程:清洁还是污染?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jan;88(1):13-5. doi: 10.1308/003588406X83032.
9
Efficiency of hand drying for removing bacteria from washed hands: comparison of paper towel drying with warm air drying.洗手后手部干燥除菌的效率:纸巾擦干与暖风吹干的比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;26(3):316-20. doi: 10.1086/502546.
10
Comparative efficacy of handwashing agents against cytomegalovirus.洗手剂抗巨细胞病毒的比较疗效
Infect Control. 1987 Apr;8(4):158-62. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700065826.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and effectiveness of hand hygiene-related practices used in community settings for removal of organisms from hands: a systematic review.社区环境中用于手部除菌的手部卫生相关做法的有效性和实际效果:一项系统综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Sep 16;10(Suppl 7):e018925. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018925.
2
Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers: Does Gelling Agent Really Matter?含酒精洗手液:凝胶剂真的重要吗?
Gels. 2022 Jan 29;8(2):87. doi: 10.3390/gels8020087.
3
Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study.
聚维酮碘和葡萄糖酸氯己定清洁剂在体内手部卫生临床模拟研究中的杀菌和杀病毒活性
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Jun;7(2):235-247. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0202-5. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?骨科实践中的神话与传说:我们都有罪吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2861-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0458-2. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
5
Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation.聚维酮碘:用于手部消毒、皮肤准备及防腐冲洗。
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(3):376-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00405.x.
6
Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.手部卫生的流行病学背景以及对用于洗手和擦手的最重要制剂的评估。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):863-93, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.
7
Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with an antiseptic soap and nasal mupirocin among colonized patients--an open uncontrolled clinical trial.在定植患者中使用抗菌肥皂和鼻用莫匹罗星根除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌——一项开放的非对照临床试验
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2004 Jun 3;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-3-9.