• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形态启动:启动持续时间、语义透明度和词缀位置的作用。

Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position.

作者信息

Feldman L B, Soltano E G

机构信息

University at Albany, SUNY, NY 12222, USA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1999;68(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2077.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1999.2077
PMID:10433736
Abstract

Patterns of facilitation in three lexical decision studies reveal several properties of morphologically complex words that influence processing. In one study, effects of morphological (VOWED-VOW) similarity are contrasted with effects of either semantic (PLEDGE-VOW) or orthographic (VOWEL-VOW) similarity at two prime durations to show the distinctiveness of morphological processing. In a second study, we compare morphologically complex forms that are semantically transparent (CASUALLY-CASUALNESS) with opaque forms (CASUALTY-CASUALNESS) and show that opaque relatives are more similar to VOWEL-VOW type pairs than to transparent relatives. In the third study, we examine facilitation for complex targets (CALCULATION) preceded by prefixed (MISCALCULATE) and suffixed (CALCULATOR) relatives and show that the position of the base morpheme influences processing under cross-modal but not under purely visual presentation conditions. Taken collectively, under comparable presentation conditions, semantic transparency but not base morpheme position constrains morphological processing.

摘要

三项词汇判断研究中的促进模式揭示了影响加工的形态复杂词的几个特性。在一项研究中,在两个启动时长下,将形态(VOWED-VOW)相似性的影响与语义(PLEDGE-VOW)或正字法(VOWEL-VOW)相似性的影响进行对比,以显示形态加工的独特性。在第二项研究中,我们将语义透明的形态复杂形式(CASUALLY-CASUALNESS)与不透明形式(CASUALTY-CASUALNESS)进行比较,结果表明,不透明形式的词对与VOWEL-VOW类型的词对比与透明形式的词对更相似。在第三项研究中,我们考察了在复杂目标词(CALCULATION)之前出现前缀相关词(MISCALCULATE)和后缀相关词(CALCULATOR)时的促进作用,结果表明,在跨模态呈现条件下而非纯视觉呈现条件下,基础语素的位置会影响加工。总体而言,在可比的呈现条件下,语义透明度而非基础语素位置会限制形态加工。

相似文献

1
Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position.形态启动:启动持续时间、语义透明度和词缀位置的作用。
Brain Lang. 1999;68(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2077.
2
What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?语义透明度的分级效应揭示了关于形态加工的哪些内容?
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):17-30. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00416-4.
3
Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology.启动效应中的语义和语音分级相似性效应:形态学分布式联结主义方法的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):323-45. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323.
4
The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: an ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology.语义和语音因素在单词识别中的作用:衍生形态学的 ERP 跨模态启动研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):161-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.027. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Role of inflectional regularity and semantic transparency in reading morphologically complex words: evidence from acquired dyslexia.曲折规则性和语义透明度在阅读形态复杂单词中的作用:来自后天性阅读障碍的证据。
Neurocase. 2008;14(4):347-68. doi: 10.1080/13554790802368679.
6
The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words.语义透明度在英语复合词加工中的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2008 Feb;99(Pt 1):87-107. doi: 10.1348/000712607X181304.
7
Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.转置字母相似性效应是否发生在词素层面?形态正字法分解的证据。
Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):691-703. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
8
The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming.形态复杂单词的语义透明度对图片命名的影响。
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):203-12. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00433-4.
9
Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition.视觉单词识别过程中形态分解的神经关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1983-93. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983.
10
Episodic accessibility and morphological processing: evidence from long-term auditory priming.情景可及性与形态加工:来自长期听觉启动的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan;130(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating variability in morphological processing with Bayesian distributional models.使用贝叶斯分布模型研究形态处理的可变性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2264-2274. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02109-w. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
2
From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading.从分解论到阅读中形态加工的分布理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1673-1702. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02086-0. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Evidence from neglect dyslexia for morphological decomposition at the early stages of orthographic-visual analysis.
来自忽视性阅读障碍的证据表明,在正字法视觉分析的早期阶段存在形态分解。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 15;9:497. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00497. eCollection 2015.
4
Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.意义分析必须紧跟形式分析吗?一项时间进程分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 11;9:111. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111. eCollection 2015.
5
Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.坚持理解:德语复杂动词中茎突进入的电生理证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 26;9:62. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00062. eCollection 2015.
6
L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs.L2 学习者会对形态复杂的动词进行分解:来自于透明派生动词启动的 fMRI 证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 10;8:802. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00802. eCollection 2014.
7
Predicting raters' transparency judgments of English and Chinese morphological constituents using latent semantic analysis.使用潜在语义分析预测评分者对英语和汉语形态成分的透明度判断。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):284-306. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0360-z.
8
Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.联结主义与词法在视觉单词识别中的作用
Ment Lex. 2010 Jan 1;5(3):371-400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue.
9
On the Interaction of Letter Transpositions and Morphemic Boundaries.论字母换位与语素边界的相互作用
Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(4-6):482-508. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.500020. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
10
Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.“CORNER”和“BROTHER”在形态上复杂吗?从长远来看并非如此。
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.