Rueckl Jay G, Aicher Karen
Haskins Laboratories, University of Connecticut.
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
Previous studies haves shown that under masked priming conditions, CORNER primes CORN as strongly as TEACHER primes TEACH and more strongly than BROTHEL primes BROTH. This result has been taken as evidence of a purely structural level of representation at which words are decomposed into morphological constituents in a manner that is independent of semantics. The research reported here investigated the influence of semantic transparency on long-term morphological priming. Two experiments demonstrated that while lexical decisions were facilitated by semantically transparent primes like TEACHER, semantically opaque words like CORNER had no effect. Although differences in the nonword foils used in each experiment gave rise to somewhat different patterns of results, this difference in the effects of transparent and opaque primes was found in both experiments. The implications of this finding for accounts of morphological effects on visual word identification are discussed.
先前的研究表明,在掩蔽启动条件下,“CORNER”对“CORN”的启动作用与“TEACHER”对“TEACH”的启动作用一样强烈,且比“BROTHEL”对“BROTH”的启动作用更强。这一结果被视为存在一种纯粹结构层面表征的证据,在该层面上,单词以独立于语义的方式被分解为形态成分。此处报告的研究调查了语义透明度对长期形态启动的影响。两项实验表明,虽然像“TEACHER”这样语义透明的启动词促进了词汇判断,但像“CORNER”这样语义不透明的词却没有效果。尽管每个实验中使用的非词干扰项的差异导致了有些不同的结果模式,但在两个实验中都发现了透明和不透明启动词在效果上的这种差异。本文讨论了这一发现对形态效应对视觉单词识别影响的解释的意义。