Methods in health service research. Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level.
作者信息
Ukoumunne O C, Gulliford M C, Chinn S, Sterne J A, Burney P G, Donner A
机构信息
Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, King's College, London SE1 3QD.
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):376-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.376.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Methods in health service research. Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level.卫生服务研究方法。地区和组织层面卫生干预措施的评估。
BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):376-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.376.
2
Integrating public health research trials into health systems in Africa: individual or cluster randomisation?将公共卫生研究试验纳入非洲卫生系统：个体随机分组还是整群随机分组？
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jan;19(1):123-7. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12230. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
Opening a window on systems science research in health promotion and public health.开启一扇通往健康促进与公共卫生领域系统科学研究的窗口。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(1 Suppl):5S-8S. doi: 10.1177/1090198113503343.
4
The delivery and organization of public health in England: setting the research agenda.英国公共卫生的提供与组织：设定研究议程。
Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
5
Improving Efficiency in Mobile Data Collection for Place-Based Public Health Research.提高基于地点的公共卫生研究中移动数据收集的效率。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(S2):S123-S125. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304875.
6
Evaluating a Key Instrumental Variable Assumption Using Randomization Tests.使用随机化检验评估关键工具变量假设。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 2;189(11):1412-1420. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa089.
7
New directions in European public health research: report of a workshop.欧洲公共卫生研究的新方向：研讨会报告
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):194-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048504.
8
Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.评估健康与医疗领域全区域及基于组织的干预措施的方法：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92.
9
[Workplace education? A medical service to be tested in the field].
Sante Publique. 2002 Sep;14(3):301-9.
10
Towards evidence-based public health policy in China.迈向中国基于证据的公共卫生政策。
Lancet. 2013 Jun 8;381(9882):1962-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61083-1.
引用本文的文献
1
Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.以冠状动脉钙化积分为一线检查，用于检测和排除因稳定型胸痛就诊于全科医生的患者中的冠状动脉疾病：CONCRETE 试验的整群随机方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e055123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055123.
2
Effectiveness of a kindergarten-based intervention to increase vegetable intake and reduce food neophobia amongst 1-year-old children: a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项基于幼儿园的干预措施对增加1岁儿童蔬菜摄入量和减少食物恐新症的效果：一项整群随机对照试验。
Food Nutr Res. 2021 Oct 8;65. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7679. eCollection 2021.
3
Quasi-cluster randomized trial of a six-month low-intensity group-based resistance exercise for hemodialysis patients on depression and cognitive function: a 12-month follow-up.基于小组的六个月低强度抗阻运动对血液透析患者抑郁和认知功能影响的半集群随机试验：12个月随访
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Aug 30;9(1):741-760. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1966302. eCollection 2021.
4
Integrated care pathways in neurosurgery: A systematic review.神经外科整合照护路径：系统性回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255628. eCollection 2021.
5
European violence risk and mental disorders (EU-VIORMED): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol.欧洲暴力风险与精神障碍研究（EU-VIORMED）：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2379-x.
6
Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.以纸质形式向医疗保健专业人员发送的计算机生成提醒：对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD001175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001175.pub4.
7
Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial.采用行动实施工具箱的电子审核与反馈干预以改善重症监护中的疼痛管理：一项实验室实验和整群随机试验方案
Implement Sci. 2017 May 25;12(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0594-8.
8
Incorporating Contact Network Structure in Cluster Randomized Trials.在整群随机试验中纳入接触网络结构
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 3;5:17581. doi: 10.1038/srep17581.
9
Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in care pathways and usual care: hospital treatment for heart failure.护理路径和常规护理中整群随机试验的组内相关系数：心力衰竭的医院治疗
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 24;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-84.
10
Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.关于药物剂量的计算机化建议，以改善处方实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD002894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3.
本文引用的文献
1
Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.评估健康与医疗领域全区域及基于组织的干预措施的方法：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92.
2
Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994.基于社区的调查和干预研究设计的方差成分和组内相关性：来自1994年英格兰健康调查的数据
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 May 1;149(9):876-83. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009904.
3
More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions. Introduction to the special issue.针对社区层面健康干预措施的更合适评估方法。特刊引言。
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):237-43. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000301.
4
Multilevel models: applications to health data.多层次模型：在健康数据中的应用。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jul;1(3):154-64. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100307.
5
Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research.背景、构成与异质性：健康研究中多级模型的应用
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jan;46(1):97-117. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00148-2.
6
The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques.配对整群随机试验的设计与分析：荟萃分析技术的应用
Stat Med. 1997 Sep 30;16(18):2063-79. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970930)16:18<2063::aid-sim642>3.0.co;2-8.
7
The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale.社区干预试验中匹配的优点：一个警示故事。
Stat Med. 1997 Aug 15;16(15):1753-64. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970815)16:15<1753::aid-sim597>3.0.co;2-e.
8
Cohort versus cross-sectional design in large field trials: precision, sample size, and a unifying model.大型现场试验中的队列设计与横断面设计：精度、样本量及统一模型
Stat Med. 1994 Jan 15;13(1):61-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130108.
9
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.为什么我们需要观察性研究来评估医疗保健的有效性。
BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215.
10
Optimal survey design for community intervention evaluations: cohort or cross-sectional?社区干预评估的最佳调查设计：队列研究还是横断面研究？
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1461-72. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00055-0.
Zotero 插件