Teeri S, Välimäki M, Katajisto J
Hoitotiede. 1998;10(4):216-26.
The aim of this study was to describe the views of demented patients' relatives concerning the fulfillment of patients' rights in institutions. The Act on Patients' Rights and Status of March 1st, 1993, served as the basis for this study. Of the Act, the patients' rights to good care and treatment, to information and to self-determination were discussed. The data were collected from six medical wards for long-term patients at a hospital and from an old people's home by using a questionnaire. Ninety relatives of demented patients participated in the study, the response rate being 60%. The data were analyzed statistically. The relatives stated that the right to good care and treatment was realized best. The right to information was fulfilled quite well according to the respondents. The fact that the staff would not give information on their own initiative was regarded as lack of information. The right to self-determination was realized most poorly; 44% of the respondents could not say whether their relatives were able to affect the care with their opinions and wishes, and 59% could not answer whether the patient could reject the care. On the contrary, the respondents preferred their own right to influence decision-making concerning the care. Pensioners who answered the inquiry were more satisfied with the fulfillment of the patients' rights than others when the three rights were discussed. However, children as relatives were more dissatisfied than other relatives with the fulfillment of the right to information and self-determination.
本研究的目的是描述痴呆患者亲属对于机构中患者权利实现情况的看法。1993年3月1日的《患者权利与地位法案》是本研究的基础。该法案中,讨论了患者获得良好护理与治疗、信息以及自我决定权的权利。通过问卷调查从一家医院的六个长期患者医疗病房以及一家养老院收集数据。90名痴呆患者的亲属参与了研究,回复率为60%。对数据进行了统计分析。亲属们表示,获得良好护理与治疗的权利实现得最好。根据受访者的说法,信息权得到了较好的落实。工作人员不会主动提供信息这一事实被视为信息缺乏。自我决定权的落实情况最差;44%的受访者表示无法确定他们的亲属是否能够通过其意见和愿望影响护理,59%的受访者无法回答患者是否可以拒绝护理。相反,受访者更倾向于自己有权影响有关护理的决策。在讨论这三项权利时,回复询问的退休人员对患者权利的落实情况比其他人更满意。然而,作为亲属的子女对信息权和自我决定权落实情况的不满程度高于其他亲属。