Stoltzfus A
Department of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4H7 Canada.
J Mol Evol. 1999 Aug;49(2):169-81. doi: 10.1007/pl00006540.
The neutral theory often is presented as a theory of "noise" or silent changes at an isolated "molecular level," relevant to marking the steady pace of divergence, but not to the origin of biological structure, function, or complexity. Nevertheless, precisely these issues can be addressed in neutral models, such as those elaborated here with regard to scrambled ciliate genes, gRNA-mediated RNA editing, the transition from self-splicing to spliceosomal splicing, and the retention of duplicate genes. All of these are instances of a more general scheme of "constructive neutral evolution" that invokes biased variation, epistatic interactions, and excess capacities to account for a complex series of steps giving rise to novel structures or operations. The directional and constructive outcomes of these models are due not to neutral allele fixations per se, but to these other factors. Neutral models of this type may help to clarify the poorly understood role of nonselective factors in evolutionary innovation and directionality.
中性理论常常被呈现为一种关于孤立“分子层面”的“噪声”或沉默变化的理论,它与标记分化的稳定速度相关,但与生物结构、功能或复杂性的起源无关。然而,恰恰是这些问题可以在中性模型中得到解决,比如这里详细阐述的关于乱序纤毛虫基因、gRNA介导的RNA编辑、从自我剪接向剪接体剪接的转变以及重复基因保留的模型。所有这些都是“建设性中性进化”这一更普遍模式的实例,该模式借助偏向性变异、上位相互作用和过剩能力来解释导致新结构或新操作的一系列复杂步骤。这些模型的定向和建设性结果并非源于中性等位基因本身的固定,而是源于这些其他因素。这种类型的中性模型可能有助于阐明非选择性因素在进化创新和方向性方面理解不足的作用。