• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯沙坦与缓释非洛地平治疗轻至中度高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较。

Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan and extended-release felodipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Hung M J, Lin F C, Cherng W J, Wang C H, Hung K C, Hsieh I C, Wen M S, Wu D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 1999 Jun;98(6):403-9.

PMID:10443063
Abstract

Appropriate control of blood pressure has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Losartan potassium, a selective antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, has been shown to lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of losartan and extended-release (ER) felodipine in Taiwanese patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients with mild to moderate hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure, 95-115 mm Hg) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, parallel study. Sitting blood pressure, heart rate, adverse reactions, and serum biochemistry values were assessed during 2 weeks of placebo and 12 weeks of active treatment. Each patient received 50 mg of losartan or 5 mg of felodipine ER once daily, and the dosage was adjusted to double the initial level at week 6 if necessary. Of the 44 patients randomly allocated to receive losartan (n = 23) or felodipine (n = 21) therapy, 37 completed the study; three patients in the losartan group and four in the felodipine group withdrew because of adverse experiences, or were lost to follow-up. The mean reductions in sitting diastolic blood pressure at 6 and 12 weeks were significant with both losartan (-8.6 and -11.38 mm Hg, respectively) and felodipine (-9.2 and -10.69 mm Hg, respectively), and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both losartan and ER felodipine were well tolerated by patients. However, the ER felodipine group had a significantly higher rate of drug-related flushing than the losartan group (24% vs 0%, p = 0.022). The results indicate that once-daily administration of losartan is as effective and well tolerated as once-daily ER felodipine in blood pressure reduction.

摘要

已证实适当控制血压可降低高血压患者的发病率和死亡率。氯沙坦钾是一种血管紧张素II 1型(AT1)受体的选择性拮抗剂,已被证明可降低高血压患者的血压。本研究的目的是比较氯沙坦和缓释非洛地平在台湾轻至中度高血压患者中的疗效和耐受性。轻至中度高血压患者(坐位舒张压为95 - 115 mmHg)被纳入这项前瞻性、随机、平行研究。在2周的安慰剂期和12周的积极治疗期内评估坐位血压、心率、不良反应和血清生化值。每位患者每日服用50 mg氯沙坦或5 mg缓释非洛地平,必要时在第6周将剂量调整至初始水平的两倍。在随机分配接受氯沙坦(n = 23)或非洛地平(n = 21)治疗的44例患者中,37例完成了研究;氯沙坦组3例患者和非洛地平组4例患者因不良事件退出或失访。氯沙坦(分别为-8.6和-11.38 mmHg)和非洛地平(分别为-9.2和-10.69 mmHg)在第6周和第12周时坐位舒张压的平均降低均显著,两组之间无显著差异。氯沙坦和缓释非洛地平在患者中耐受性均良好。然而,缓释非洛地平组与药物相关的面部潮红发生率显著高于氯沙坦组(24% 对0%,p = 0.022)。结果表明,每日一次服用氯沙坦在降低血压方面与每日一次服用缓释非洛地平同样有效且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan and extended-release felodipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦与缓释非洛地平治疗轻至中度高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1999 Jun;98(6):403-9.
2
Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦钾与非洛地平缓释片治疗老年轻、中度高血压的疗效及安全性对比的随机双盲平行研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Sep;9(9):765-71.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, compared with losartan (50/100 mg): a 12-week, phase III, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose escalation clinical trial with an optional 12-week extension phase in adult Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.一项为期 12 周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行分组、剂量递增的 III 期临床试验,旨在比较新型血管紧张素受体阻滞剂菲玛沙坦与氯沙坦(50/100mg)在轻中度高血压成年韩国患者中的疗效和耐受性,该试验设有 12 周的可选扩展期。
Clin Ther. 2012 Mar;34(3):552-568, 568.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
5
A randomized, double-blind comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of once-daily losartan compared to twice-daily captopril in mild to moderate essential hypertension.一项针对轻度至中度原发性高血压患者的随机双盲研究,比较每日一次服用氯沙坦与每日两次服用卡托普利的降压疗效及安全性。
Acta Cardiol. 1997;52(6):495-506.
6
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new once-daily felodipine-metoprolol combination compared with each component alone. The Swedish/UK Study Group.一种新型每日一次非洛地平-美托洛尔复方制剂与单一组分相比的降压疗效及耐受性。瑞典/英国研究小组。
Blood Press Suppl. 1993;1:22-9.
7
A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate-Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M-FACT).美托洛尔琥珀酸盐缓释片与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的析因研究——美托洛尔琥珀酸盐-非洛地平抗高血压联合试验(M-FACT)结果
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;19(4):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.007.
8
Felodipine extended release versus conventional diuretic therapy for the treatment of systolic hypertension in elderly patients. The National Trial Group.非洛地平缓释片与传统利尿剂疗法治疗老年患者收缩期高血压的比较。国家试验组。
Clin Invest Med. 1998 Jun;21(3):142-50.
9
Comparison of clinical efficacy and adverse effects between extended-release felodipine and atenolol in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平与阿替洛尔治疗轻中度原发性高血压的临床疗效及不良反应比较
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1997 Jun;20(2):86-93.
10
Long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the combination of enalapril and felodipine ER in the treatment of hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.依那普利与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的长期疗效、耐受性及安全性。依那普利-非洛地平缓释片析因研究组。
Clin Ther. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):527-38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80062-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.抗高血压药物降低血压疗效的更新荟萃分析方法
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(11):735-53. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727110-00001.