• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

铅危害控制项目后实现灰尘铅清除标准:对住房和城市发展部推荐的清洁程序及简化替代方案的评估

Achieving dust lead clearance standards after lead hazard control projects: an evaluation of the HUD-recommended cleaning procedure and an abbreviated alternative.

作者信息

Dixon S, Tohn E, Rupp R, Clark S

机构信息

National Center for Lead-Safe Housing, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999 May;14(5):339-44. doi: 10.1080/104732299302927.

DOI:10.1080/104732299302927
PMID:10446486
Abstract

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing strongly recommend that after lead hazard control interventions all walls, ceilings, floors, and other horizontal surfaces be cleaned using a three-step process to reduce lead-contaminated dust and debris. The three steps are: an initial vacuuming using a machine equipped with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter (HEPA vacuum), wet wash with a lead cleaner, and a final HEPA vacuum. This study evaluated the effectiveness of two cleaning protocols: (1) the HUD-recommended three-step procedure, and (2) an abbreviated two-step cleaning procedure that omits the final HEPA vacuum. Cleaning procedures were evaluated in 27 dwelling units that had undergone significant lead hazard control interventions likely to produce lead dust. Dust lead samples were collected on floors and in window sills and troughs prior to the lead control hazard intervention, after the wet wash step of the cleaning procedure, and after completion of the second HEPA vacuuming. The results of the study demonstrate that dust lead surface loading on smooth and cleanable surfaces following the three-step and two-step cleaning procedures can achieve 1995 federal guidance dust clearance levels and levels substantially lower. Although the dust lead clearance rates before and after the second HEPA vacuum were the same, the time saved by omitting the second HEPA is small relative to the other elements of the cleaning process.

摘要

美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)的《住房中铅基油漆危害评估与控制指南》强烈建议,在进行铅危害控制干预措施后,应采用三步法清洁所有墙壁、天花板、地板及其他水平面,以减少铅污染灰尘和碎屑。这三个步骤是:首先使用配备高效空气微粒过滤器(HEPA)的机器进行吸尘(HEPA吸尘器),然后用铅清洁剂进行湿洗,最后再用HEPA吸尘器进行吸尘。本研究评估了两种清洁方案的效果:(1)HUD推荐的三步法程序,以及(2)省略最后一次HEPA吸尘的简化两步清洁程序。在27个居住单元中对清洁程序进行了评估,这些居住单元已经过可能产生铅尘的重大铅危害控制干预。在铅危害控制干预之前、清洁程序的湿洗步骤之后以及第二次HEPA吸尘完成之后,在地板、窗台和水槽中采集灰尘铅样本。研究结果表明,采用三步法和两步法清洁程序后,光滑且可清洁表面上的灰尘铅表面负荷能够达到1995年联邦指导方针中的灰尘清除水平,且远低于该水平。尽管第二次HEPA吸尘前后的灰尘铅清除率相同,但相对于清洁过程的其他环节而言,省略第二次HEPA吸尘所节省的时间较少。

相似文献

1
Achieving dust lead clearance standards after lead hazard control projects: an evaluation of the HUD-recommended cleaning procedure and an abbreviated alternative.铅危害控制项目后实现灰尘铅清除标准:对住房和城市发展部推荐的清洁程序及简化替代方案的评估
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999 May;14(5):339-44. doi: 10.1080/104732299302927.
2
Efficiency of final cleaning for lead-based paint abatement in indoor environments.室内环境中铅基油漆清除的最终清洁效率。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002 Mar;17(3):222-34. doi: 10.1080/104732202753438306.
3
Evaluation of cleaning methods applied in home environments after renovation and remodeling activities.翻新和改造活动后家庭环境中应用的清洁方法评估。
Environ Res. 2004 Oct;96(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2004.01.007.
4
Residential dust lead loading immediately after intervention in the HUD lead hazard control grant program.住房和城市发展部铅危害控制拨款计划干预后立即测定的住宅灰尘铅含量
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Nov;1(11):716-24. doi: 10.1080/15459620490520792.
5
Cleaning efficacy of high-efficiency particulate air-filtered vacuuming and "dry steam" cleaning on carpet.高效空气过滤器过滤式吸尘和“干蒸汽”清洁对地毯的清洁效果
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Feb;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1080/15459620701805169.
6
Evaluation of HUD-funded lead hazard control treatments at 6 years post-intervention.对住房和城市发展部资助的铅危害控制处理措施在干预后6年的评估。
Environ Res. 2006 Oct;102(2):237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
7
Selecting a lead hazard control strategy based on dust lead loading and housing condition: I. Methods and results.基于粉尘铅含量和房屋状况选择铅危害控制策略:I. 方法与结果。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Aug;5(8):530-9. doi: 10.1080/15459620802219799.
8
Comparison of home lead dust reduction techniques on hard surfaces: the New Jersey assessment of cleaning techniques trial.硬质表面家庭铅尘减少技术的比较:新泽西清洁技术评估试验
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Sep;110(9):889-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110889.
9
An evaluation of one-time professional cleaning in homes with lead-based paint hazards.对存在铅基油漆危害的家庭进行一次性专业清洁的评估。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003 Feb;18(2):138-43. doi: 10.1080/10473220301437.
10
Effectiveness of lead-hazard control interventions on dust lead loadings: findings from the evaluation of the HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program.铅危害控制干预措施对粉尘铅含量的有效性:美国住房和城市发展部基于铅涂料危害控制拨款计划评估的结果
Environ Res. 2005 Jul;98(3):303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial dust removal in vehicles does not mitigate human exposure to organophosphate esters.车辆部分除尘并不能减轻人体接触到有机磷酸酯的程度。
Environ Res. 2022 Apr 1;205:112525. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112525. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Reducing chemical exposures at home: opportunities for action.减少家庭中的化学物质暴露:行动机会
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jul 29;71(9):937-40. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208676.
3
Exposure of U.S. children to residential dust lead, 1999-2004: I. Housing and demographic factors.1999 - 2004年美国儿童接触住宅灰尘铅污染情况:I. 住房与人口因素。
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):461-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11917. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
Assessment of cleaning to control lead dust in homes of children with moderate lead poisoning: treatment of lead-exposed children trial.评估清洁措施对中度铅中毒儿童家庭铅尘的控制效果:铅暴露儿童治疗试验
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110(12):A773-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.021100773.