Wrigge H, Golisch W, Zinserling J, Sydow M, Almeling G, Burchardi H
Klinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie und Spezielle Intensivmedizin, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53 105 Bonn, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Aug;25(8):790-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050954.
To investigate the breathing pattern and the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB(I)) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assisted with proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV).
Prospective controlled study.
Intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Thirteen COPD patients being weaned from mechanical ventilation.
All patients were breathing PSV and two different levels of PAV.
During PAV (EVITA 2 prototype, Dräger, Germany), the resistance of the endotracheal tube (R(et)) was completely compensated while the patients' resistive and elastic loads were compensated for by approximately 80 % and 50 % (PAV(80) and PAV(50)), respectively. PSV was adjusted to match the same mean inspiratory pressure (Pinsp(mean)) as during PAV(80). Airway pressure, esophageal pressure and gas flow were measured over a period of 5 min during each mode. Neuromuscular drive (P(0.1)) was determined by inspiratory occlusions. Mean tidal volume (V(T)) was not significantly different between the modes. However, the coefficient of variation of V(T) was 10 +/- 4.%, 20 +/- 13 % and 15 +/- 8 % during PSV, PAV(80) and PAV(50), respectively. Respiratory rate (RR) and minute ventilation (V(E)) were significantly lower during PAV(80) as compared with both other modes, but the differences did not exceed 10 %. PAV(80) and PSV had comparable effects on WOB(I) and P(0.1), whereas WOB(I) and P(0.1) increased during PAV(50) compared with both other modes.
Mean values of breathing pattern did not differ by a large amount between the investigated modes. However, the higher variability of V(T) during PAV indicates an increased ability of the patients to control V(T) in response to alterations in respiratory demand. A reduction in assist during PAV(50) resulted in an increase in WOB and indices of patient effort.
研究在比例辅助通气(PAV)和传统压力支持通气(PSV)辅助下慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的呼吸模式和吸气作功(WOB(I))。
前瞻性对照研究。
大学医院重症监护病房。
13例正在撤机的COPD患者。
所有患者均接受PSV及两种不同水平的PAV。
在PAV期间(德国德尔格公司EVITA 2原型机),气管插管阻力(R(et))得到完全补偿,而患者的阻力负荷和弹性负荷分别得到约80%和50%的补偿(PAV(80)和PAV(50))。将PSV调整至与PAV(80)期间相同的平均吸气压力(Pinsp(mean))。在每种模式下持续5分钟测量气道压力、食管压力和气流。通过吸气阻断测定神经肌肉驱动(P(0.1))。各模式之间平均潮气量(V(T))无显著差异。然而,PSV、PAV(80)和PAV(50)期间V(T)的变异系数分别为10±4%、20±13%和15±8%。与其他两种模式相比,PAV(80)期间呼吸频率(RR)和分钟通气量(V(E))显著降低,但差异不超过10%。PAV(80)和PSV对WOB(I)和P(0.1)的影响相当,而与其他两种模式相比,PAV(50)期间WOB(I)和P(0.1)增加。
所研究的模式之间呼吸模式的平均值差异不大。然而,PAV期间V(T)的较高变异性表明患者响应呼吸需求变化控制V(T)的能力增强。PAV(50)期间辅助减少导致WOB和患者用力指标增加。