Suppr超能文献

比例辅助通气与压力支持通气:对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者呼吸模式和呼吸功的影响

Proportional assist versus pressure support ventilation: effects on breathing pattern and respiratory work of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Wrigge H, Golisch W, Zinserling J, Sydow M, Almeling G, Burchardi H

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie und Spezielle Intensivmedizin, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53 105 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1999 Aug;25(8):790-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050954.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the breathing pattern and the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB(I)) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assisted with proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV).

DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirteen COPD patients being weaned from mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients were breathing PSV and two different levels of PAV.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During PAV (EVITA 2 prototype, Dräger, Germany), the resistance of the endotracheal tube (R(et)) was completely compensated while the patients' resistive and elastic loads were compensated for by approximately 80 % and 50 % (PAV(80) and PAV(50)), respectively. PSV was adjusted to match the same mean inspiratory pressure (Pinsp(mean)) as during PAV(80). Airway pressure, esophageal pressure and gas flow were measured over a period of 5 min during each mode. Neuromuscular drive (P(0.1)) was determined by inspiratory occlusions. Mean tidal volume (V(T)) was not significantly different between the modes. However, the coefficient of variation of V(T) was 10 +/- 4.%, 20 +/- 13 % and 15 +/- 8 % during PSV, PAV(80) and PAV(50), respectively. Respiratory rate (RR) and minute ventilation (V(E)) were significantly lower during PAV(80) as compared with both other modes, but the differences did not exceed 10 %. PAV(80) and PSV had comparable effects on WOB(I) and P(0.1), whereas WOB(I) and P(0.1) increased during PAV(50) compared with both other modes.

CONCLUSION

Mean values of breathing pattern did not differ by a large amount between the investigated modes. However, the higher variability of V(T) during PAV indicates an increased ability of the patients to control V(T) in response to alterations in respiratory demand. A reduction in assist during PAV(50) resulted in an increase in WOB and indices of patient effort.

摘要

目的

研究在比例辅助通气(PAV)和传统压力支持通气(PSV)辅助下慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的呼吸模式和吸气作功(WOB(I))。

设计

前瞻性对照研究。

地点

大学医院重症监护病房。

患者

13例正在撤机的COPD患者。

干预措施

所有患者均接受PSV及两种不同水平的PAV。

测量指标及主要结果

在PAV期间(德国德尔格公司EVITA 2原型机),气管插管阻力(R(et))得到完全补偿,而患者的阻力负荷和弹性负荷分别得到约80%和50%的补偿(PAV(80)和PAV(50))。将PSV调整至与PAV(80)期间相同的平均吸气压力(Pinsp(mean))。在每种模式下持续5分钟测量气道压力、食管压力和气流。通过吸气阻断测定神经肌肉驱动(P(0.1))。各模式之间平均潮气量(V(T))无显著差异。然而,PSV、PAV(80)和PAV(50)期间V(T)的变异系数分别为10±4%、20±13%和15±8%。与其他两种模式相比,PAV(80)期间呼吸频率(RR)和分钟通气量(V(E))显著降低,但差异不超过10%。PAV(80)和PSV对WOB(I)和P(0.1)的影响相当,而与其他两种模式相比,PAV(50)期间WOB(I)和P(0.1)增加。

结论

所研究的模式之间呼吸模式的平均值差异不大。然而,PAV期间V(T)的较高变异性表明患者响应呼吸需求变化控制V(T)的能力增强。PAV(50)期间辅助减少导致WOB和患者用力指标增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验