Stone M A
Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1999 Feb;75(880):74-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.75.880.74.
Confirmed and potential benefits of eradicating Helicobacter pylori have led to the development of a range of diagnostic tests. As well as techniques using biopsy tissue obtained during endoscopy, a number of non-invasive tests are now available. These may be appropriate for pre-endoscopy screening of younger dyspeptics, for use in research, particularly epidemiological surveys, to confirm successful eradication after treatment, and possibly in the future for screening in asymptomatic populations. Serology requiring laboratory analysis is likely to be the least expensive option, particularly suitable for testing large numbers, while urea breath tests should yield the most accurate results and are appropriate for confirming successful eradication since only current infection is detected. The performance of near-patient tests can lack consistency, but these may be useful for small numbers and where other non-invasive testing is unavailable. Tests should be used with an awareness of their potential limitations in terms of accuracy.
根除幽门螺杆菌已证实的和潜在的益处促使了一系列诊断测试的发展。除了使用在内镜检查期间获取的活检组织的技术外,现在还有许多非侵入性测试。这些测试可能适用于对年轻消化不良患者进行内镜检查前的筛查、用于研究(特别是流行病学调查)、确认治疗后根除是否成功,并且未来可能用于无症状人群的筛查。需要实验室分析的血清学检测可能是最便宜的选择,特别适合大量检测,而尿素呼气试验应能产生最准确的结果,并且适合确认根除是否成功,因为它只能检测到当前感染。即时检测的性能可能缺乏一致性,但这些测试可能对少量检测以及在无法进行其他非侵入性检测的情况下有用。使用这些测试时应意识到它们在准确性方面的潜在局限性。