Fedorko D P, Engler H D, O'Shaughnessy E M, Williams E C, Reichelderfer C J, Smith W I
Microbiology Service, Clinical Pathology Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Sep;37(9):3044-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.9.3044-3047.1999.
Rapid laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is highly desirable in the setting of hospital cost containment. We tested 654 stool specimens to compare the performance of two assays for rapid detection of toxin A, the Immunocard Toxin A test (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.) and the Culturette Brand Toxin CD enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems), with a cytotoxin assay (Cytotoxi Test; Advanced Clinical Diagnostics) and culture on cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar followed by determination of the production of toxins A and B. A chart review was performed for patients whose stool specimens provided positive results on one to three of the assays. With the "gold standard" of all four assays positive or chart review evidence of CDAD, 97 (14.8%) stool specimens were positive by one or more assays and 557 (85.2%) were negative by all methods. Total agreement for all assays was 90.5% (592 of 654). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for toxigenic culture were 94.7, 98.6, 87.1, and 99.5%, respectively, for toxigenic culture; 87.7, 98.6, 86.2, and 98.8%, respectively, for the cytotoxin assay; 71.9, 99.3, 91.1, and 97.3%, respectively, for the Immunocard; and 68.4, 99.1, 88.6, and 96.9%, respectively, for the Culturette EIA. While easy to perform and highly specific, these rapid assays do not appear to be sufficient for accurate diagnosis of CDAD.
在医院控制成本的背景下,艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的快速实验室诊断非常必要。我们检测了654份粪便标本,以比较两种快速检测毒素A的检测方法的性能,即免疫卡毒素A检测(Meridian诊断公司)和Culturette品牌毒素CD酶免疫测定(EIA)(Becton Dickinson微生物系统公司),并与细胞毒素检测(细胞毒素检测;Advanced Clinical Diagnostics)以及在环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂上培养,随后测定毒素A和B的产生情况进行比较。对粪便标本在一种至三种检测中呈阳性结果的患者进行了病历回顾。以所有四种检测均为阳性或病历回顾有CDAD证据作为“金标准”,97份(14.8%)粪便标本通过一种或多种检测呈阳性,557份(85.2%)通过所有方法均为阴性。所有检测的总一致性为90.5%(654份中的592份)。产毒培养的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.7%、98.6%、87.1%和99.5%;细胞毒素检测分别为87.7%、98.6%、86.2%和98.8%;免疫卡分别为71.9%、99.3%、91.1%和97.3%;Culturette EIA分别为68.4%、99.1%、88.6%和96.9%。虽然这些快速检测方法易于操作且特异性高,但似乎不足以准确诊断CDAD。