Esteban A, Prieto J
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;67(3):379-83. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.3.379.
To evaluate the possible blink reflex responses in facial muscles reinnervated by the accessory nerve.
Eleven patients with a complete facial palsy were submitted to a surgical repair by an accessory facial nerve anastomosis (AFA). In this pathological group, blink reflex was studied by means of percutaneous electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve and recording from the orbicularis oculi muscle. A control group comprised seven normal people and seven patients with a complete Bell's facial palsy; in this group, responses on the sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) muscles were studied after supraorbital nerve stimulation.
All the patients with AFA showed a consistent degree of facial reinnervation. Ten out of the 11 patients with AFA showed reflex responses; in six, responses were configured by a double component pattern, resembling the R1 and R2 components of the blink reflex; three patients had an R1-like response and one patient showed a unique R2 component. Mean values of latencies were 15.2 (SD 4.6) ms for the R1 and 85.3 (SD 9.6) ms for the R2. In the control group, eight out of 14 people had evidence of reflex responses in the SCM muscles; these were almost exclusively configured by a bilateral late component (mean latency 63.5 (SD15.9) ms) and only one of the subjects showed an early response at 11 ms.
The trigemino-accessory reflex response in the pathological group was more complex and of a significantly higher incidence than in the control group. These differences could be tentatively explained by a mechanism of synaptic plasticity induced by the impairment of the efferent portion of the reflex. This could unmask the central linking between the trigeminal and the accessory limbs of the reflex. The findings described could be a demonstration of neurobionomic function in the repairing process of the nervous system.
评估副神经重新支配面部肌肉时可能出现的瞬目反射反应。
11例完全性面瘫患者接受了副面神经吻合术(AFA)进行手术修复。在该病理组中,通过经皮电刺激眶上神经并记录眼轮匝肌的反应来研究瞬目反射。对照组包括7名正常人和7例完全性贝尔面瘫患者;在该组中,研究眶上神经刺激后胸锁乳突肌(SCM)的反应。
所有接受AFA的患者均表现出一定程度的面部重新支配。11例接受AFA的患者中有10例表现出反射反应;其中6例的反应呈现双成分模式,类似于瞬目反射的R1和R2成分;3例患者有类似R1的反应,1例患者表现出独特的R2成分。R1的平均潜伏期为15.2(标准差4.6)毫秒,R2为85.3(标准差9.6)毫秒。在对照组中,14人中有8人在SCM肌肉中有反射反应的证据;这些反应几乎完全由双侧晚期成分构成(平均潜伏期63.5(标准差15.9)毫秒),只有1名受试者在11毫秒时有早期反应。
病理组中的三叉神经 - 副神经反射反应比对照组更复杂,发生率显著更高。这些差异可能初步由反射传出部分受损诱导的突触可塑性机制来解释。这可能揭示了反射的三叉神经和副神经分支之间的中枢联系。所描述的发现可能是神经系统修复过程中神经生物组学功能的一种表现。