Kuntz C, Herfarth C
Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Semin Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(2):96-102. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(199909)17:2<96::aid-ssu3>3.0.co;2-4.
A more differentiated therapy regimen concept for gastric cancer requires more precise pre-operative diagnostic imaging. There are several methods for pre-operative locoregional tumor staging in gastric cancer: percutaneous abdominal ultrasound with hydrotechnique (HUS), endoluminal ultrasound in the stomach (EUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The advantages and indications for each method are described and an overview of the medical literature is given. The results in the literature are compared to our own findings, which were obtained in prospective studies comparing the four different imaging methods. On the basis of our experience and the literature, we conclude that the indication for the different diagnostic imaging methods primarily depends on the type of therapy concept followed in the respective surgical department. Endoscopy with biopsy remains the primary diagnostic procedure. Endosonography (EUS) is another diagnostic procedure, which can be performed simultaneously with endoscopy. Only special questions or reasons warrant the use of other imaging methods.
针对胃癌的更具差异化的治疗方案概念需要更精确的术前诊断成像。胃癌术前局部区域肿瘤分期有多种方法:经皮腹部超声水成像技术(HUS)、胃腔内超声(EUS)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)。描述了每种方法的优点和适应症,并对医学文献进行了综述。将文献中的结果与我们自己的研究结果进行了比较,我们的研究结果来自对四种不同成像方法进行比较的前瞻性研究。根据我们的经验和文献,我们得出结论,不同诊断成像方法的适应症主要取决于各个外科科室所遵循的治疗方案类型。内镜活检仍然是主要的诊断程序。超声内镜检查(EUS)是另一种诊断程序,可以与内镜检查同时进行。只有特殊问题或原因才需要使用其他成像方法。