• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[利用双链抗DNA抗体和法尔技术预测红斑狼疮复发的能力]

[Capacity to predict a recurrence of lupus erythematosus using double-stranded anti-DNA antibodies and Farr technique].

作者信息

Massardo L, Martínez M E, Pérez R, Ramírez V, Foradori A, González A, Radrigán F, Gutiérrez F, Jacobelli S

机构信息

Departamento de Inmunología Clínica y Reumatología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 1999 Apr;127(4):411-20.

PMID:10451606
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and elevated high affinity double-stranded anti-DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA), measured using Farr technique, would have a risk of relapse that fluctuates between 40 to 80% according to different series.

AIM

To study the association between anti-dsDNA levels measured using Farr technique and disease activity and their predictive capacity for relapses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Anti-dsDNA antibodies were measured according to Farr method in 60 healthy subjects, 69 patients with other connective tissue diseases and in 120 patients with SLE. Farr positive were considered those individuals with anti-dsDNA levels over 10.4 IU/ml. Disease activity, assessed using MEX-SLEDAI score was related with anti-dsDNA levels in 101 patients. Forty seven patients with inactive disease were followed for 17 +/- 14 months.

RESULTS

Anti-dsDNA levels were 3 +/- 2.5 IU/ml (range 1-26) in subjects without LED, and 127 +/- 500 IU/ml (range 1-5280) in patients with LED. Sixty subjects had an active SLE and 43 (72%) were Farr positive; in 41 the disease was inactive and 13 (32%) were Farr positive (p < 0.001), OR 5.45. Twelve of the 47 followed patients had a relapse and 10 (83%) were Farr positive. Of those that did not have a relapse, 13 (37%) were Farr positive (p < 0.02, RR 5.22). Six of 15 patients that were followed for more than on year (40%), were Farr positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies measured using Farr technique in patients with inactive generalised lupus erythematosus, predicted the risk of relapse. However less than half of patients with inactive disease and elevated Farr relapsed in a period of one year. The need to treat patients with inactive SLE and positive Farr should therefore be considered debatable.

摘要

背景

使用Farr技术检测发现,非活动期系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者且高亲和力双链抗DNA抗体(抗dsDNA)升高,根据不同系列研究,其复发风险在40%至80%之间波动。

目的

研究使用Farr技术检测的抗dsDNA水平与疾病活动度之间的关联及其对复发的预测能力。

材料与方法

采用Farr方法检测60名健康受试者、69名其他结缔组织病患者和120名SLE患者的抗dsDNA抗体。抗dsDNA水平超过10.4 IU/ml的个体被视为Farr阳性。使用MEX-SLEDAI评分评估疾病活动度,并将其与101例患者的抗dsDNA水平相关联。对47例非活动期疾病患者进行了17±14个月的随访。

结果

无狼疮性肾炎(LED)的受试者抗dsDNA水平为3±2.5 IU/ml(范围1 - 26),有LED的患者抗dsDNA水平为127±500 IU/ml(范围1 - 5280)。60例患者患有活动期SLE,其中43例(72%)Farr阳性;41例疾病为非活动期,13例(32%)Farr阳性(p < 0.001),比值比为5.45。47例随访患者中有12例复发,10例(83%)Farr阳性。未复发的患者中,13例(37%)Farr阳性(p < 0.02,相对危险度为5.22)。15例随访超过一年的患者中有6例(40%)Farr阳性。

结论

使用Farr技术检测发现,非活动期全身性红斑狼疮患者抗dsDNA抗体升高可预测复发风险。然而,在一年时间内,非活动期疾病且Farr检测结果升高的患者中复发的不到一半。因此,是否需要治疗非活动期SLE且Farr检测结果为阳性的患者存在争议。

相似文献

1
[Capacity to predict a recurrence of lupus erythematosus using double-stranded anti-DNA antibodies and Farr technique].[利用双链抗DNA抗体和法尔技术预测红斑狼疮复发的能力]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Apr;127(4):411-20.
2
Anti-nucleosome antibodies as a disease activity marker in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.抗核小体抗体作为系统性红斑狼疮患者的疾病活动标志物。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2009 Jul;12(2):100-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2009.01391.x.
3
BioPlex 2200 multiplexed system: simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.BioPlex 2200多重检测系统:系统性红斑狼疮患者中抗双链DNA和抗染色质抗体的同时检测。
Autoimmunity. 2009 Jan;42(1):63-8. doi: 10.1080/08916930802354906.
4
Anti-C1q antibodies and antiendothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus - relationship with disease activity and renal involvement.系统性红斑狼疮中的抗C1q抗体和抗内皮细胞抗体——与疾病活动度及肾脏受累的关系
Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;22(4-5):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-003-0724-3.
5
Anti-dsDNA antibody testing by Farr and ELISA techniques is not equivalent.采用Farr法和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术检测抗双链DNA(dsDNA)抗体的结果并不等同。
J Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;33(9):1785-8. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
6
Significance of antibodies to double-stranded DNA in 30 systemic lupus erythematosus patients.30例系统性红斑狼疮患者中抗双链DNA抗体的意义
Isr J Med Sci. 1979 Jun;15(6):507-11.
7
Complement-fixing anti--double-stranded DNA with the Crithidia method: a better indicator of active SLE than anti-DNA with the Farr method.用克氏锥虫法检测的补体结合抗双链DNA:比用Farr法检测的抗DNA更能准确反映活动期系统性红斑狼疮。
J Lab Clin Med. 1979 Jan;93(1):32-9.
8
Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.诊断系统性红斑狼疮:新一代免疫测定法用于检测抗 dsDNA 抗体是替代 Farr 技术和克氏锥虫免疫荧光试验的有效方法。
Lupus. 2010 Jul;19(8):906-12. doi: 10.1177/0961203310362995. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
9
Anti-chromatin and anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to other systemic autoimmune diseases.系统性红斑狼疮中抗染色质抗体和抗C1q抗体与其他系统性自身免疫性疾病的比较。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul-Aug;36(4):291-8. doi: 10.1080/03009740701218717.
10
Performance of anti-C1q, antinucleosome, and anti-dsDNA antibodies for detecting concurrent disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus.抗 C1q、抗核小体和抗双链 DNA 抗体在检测系统性红斑狼疮并发疾病活动中的表现。
Transl Res. 2010 Dec;156(6):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Aug 20.