• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与复方避孕药的前瞻性多中心研究:最终结果

Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.

作者信息

Kirkman R J, Bromham D R, O'Connor T P, Sahota J E

机构信息

Palatine Centre, Manchester.

出版信息

Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):36-40.

PMID:10454652
Abstract

Norplant is a hormonal, long term method of contraception requiring the sub-dermal placement of six flexible capsules containing levonorgestrel in the inner aspect of the upper non-dominant arm. This open, prospective, multicentre, parallel group study, comparing the acceptability of Norplant and a combined pill, was originally designed to follow 700 subjects for five years, but was discontinued early. The main outcome criteria were duration of use and reason for discontinuation if appropriate. This final analysis, concerning the 364 subjects who used the implant and 307 subjects who used a gestodene/ethinyloestradiol combined pill, shows a statistically significantly higher (p<0.001) continuation rate amongst the implant users at 83.4 per cent compared to the pill users at 64.4 per cent at one year and this difference decreased only slightly by two years. The most common reasons for discontinuation by the end of the study were adverse events in both groups (menstrual and then mood changes in the implant group and mood changes and then headaches in the pill group). From the whole cohort the proportion which were 'very satisfied' were higher in the implant group (28.5 per cent compared to 14.6 per cent). This study confirms, in the UK, a high continuation rate for implant users similar to other countries as reported in the literature. If acceptability and continuation rates are similar in the none study setting, then a substantial number of women will seek removal of the implant and possible reinsertion five years after the time of initial high popularity (ie 1999). Doctors need to be prepared for this possible high level of activity.

摘要

诺普兰是一种激素类长效避孕方法,需要在上臂非优势侧内侧皮下植入6个含左炔诺孕酮的柔性胶囊。这项开放性、前瞻性、多中心、平行组研究比较了诺普兰和复方口服避孕药的可接受性,最初设计是对700名受试者进行为期5年的随访,但提前终止。主要结局标准为使用时长及(如适用)停药原因。这项针对364名使用植入剂的受试者和307名使用孕二烯酮/炔雌醇复方口服避孕药的受试者的最终分析显示,植入剂使用者的持续率在统计学上显著更高(p<0.001),一年时为83.

相似文献

1
Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与复方避孕药的前瞻性多中心研究:最终结果
Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):36-40.
2
The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.左炔诺孕酮棒和皮下埋植避孕剂的性能:一项5年随机研究。
Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3371-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3371.
3
Comparative study on the efficacy and acceptability of two contraceptive pills administered by the vaginal route: an international multicenter clinical trial.两种经阴道给药避孕药的疗效和可接受性比较研究:一项国际多中心临床试验。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Jan;53(1):65-75. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1993.10.
4
Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age.两种低剂量口服避孕药敏定偶和美欣乐在30岁以上女性中的临床比较。
Contraception. 1994 Jan;49(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90107-4.
5
Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.青少年使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与口服避孕药的对照研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 1):1128-35; discussion 1135-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91471-4.
6
Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.英国的诺普兰皮下埋植剂:第一年的续用和取出情况
Contraception. 1996 Jun;53(6):345-51. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00083-2.
7
Hormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant implant users.诺普兰植入剂使用者出血异常的激素治疗。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;174(3):919-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70326-5.
8
Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.长效避孕方法的续用率。左炔诺孕酮皮下埋植剂与宫内节育器的比较研究。
Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):19-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00202-3.
9
Effect of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, Norplant, on blood coagulation.左炔诺孕酮避孕植入剂(诺普兰)对血液凝固的影响。
Contraception. 1984 Nov;30(5):421-30. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(84)90034-9.
10
Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.左炔诺孕酮缓释避孕植入剂的患者满意度。取出原因及模式。
J Reprod Med. 1996 Nov;41(11):849-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissolving Microneedles Loaded with Gestodene: Fabrication and Characterization In Vitro and In Vivo.载有孕二烯酮的溶蚀性微针:体外和体内的制备与表征
Iran J Pharm Res. 2023 May 19;22(1):e131819. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-131819. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.避孕植入剂的安全性与益处:一项系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;14(6):548. doi: 10.3390/ph14060548.
3
Development and validation of an acceptability and satisfaction questionnaire for a contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing.
一种避孕阴道环(NuvaRing)可接受性和满意度调查问卷的开发与验证。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(4):245-56. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00003.