Ciernik I F, Schanz U, Gmür J
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Jul;24(2):147-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701872.
The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been established to improve hematological recovery after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The optimal timing to start with G-CSF has not been determined. This study investigates whether delayed use of G-CSF starting on day 6 is as safe and efficient as starting treatment with G-CSF immediately after BMT. Thirty-eight patients undergoing allogeneic BMT were randomized to either receive post-transplant G-CSF treatment starting at day 1 or at day 6. The time to hematological recovery was monitored and the groups were compared with respect to peritransplant morbidity and mortality. Recovery of the neutrophil granulocyte counts (PMN) to >100/microl, >500/microl and >1000/microl was comparable in both groups. The nadir of the PMN counts after stopping G-CSF was also similar. There was no difference in the recovery of red blood cells and platelet counts and no difference between the two groups with respect to the number of febrile episodes, number of days with antibiotics or number of documented bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Delayed treatment with G-CSF resulted in a reduction of G-CSF treatment from 19 days to 14 days (P = 0.0017). Reducing the length of treatment by 5 days lowered G-CSF treatment costs by 26.3%. Therefore, postponing treatment with G-CSF has no influence on the hematological recovery after allogeneic BMT. There is an economical benefit of postponing G-CSF use without any clinical disadvantages.
已证实使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可改善异基因骨髓移植(BMT)后的血液学恢复。开始使用G-CSF的最佳时机尚未确定。本研究调查了在第6天开始延迟使用G-CSF是否与BMT后立即开始使用G-CSF治疗一样安全有效。38例接受异基因BMT的患者被随机分为两组,一组在移植后第1天开始接受G-CSF治疗,另一组在第6天开始。监测血液学恢复时间,并比较两组在移植前后的发病率和死亡率。两组中性粒细胞计数(PMN)恢复至>100/微升、>500/微升和>1000/微升的情况相当。停用G-CSF后PMN计数的最低点也相似。红细胞和血小板计数的恢复情况无差异,两组在发热发作次数、使用抗生素天数或记录的细菌、真菌或病毒感染次数方面也无差异。延迟使用G-CSF治疗使G-CSF治疗时间从19天减少至14天(P = 0.0017)。治疗时间缩短5天使G-CSF治疗成本降低26.3%。因此,推迟使用G-CSF对异基因BMT后的血液学恢复没有影响。推迟使用G-CSF在没有任何临床劣势的情况下具有经济效益。