Silverman W K, Ginsburg G S, Goedhart A W
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 1999 Sep;37(9):903-17. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00189-2.
We developed various factor models of the Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index [Silverman, W. K., Fleisig, W., Rabian, B. & Peterson, R. A. (1991). Childhood anxiety sensitivity index. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 162-168] and tested the goodness of fit of the models in an independent sample. Of primary interest was to examine the question that characterized the factor analytic studies conducted on the adult version of the anxiety sensitivity index, i.e. the ASI [Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M. & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1-8]: is anxiety sensitivity in children a unidimensional construct, an orthogonal multidimensional construct, or a hierarchical construct? Two independent samples (a clinic sample and a nonclinical sample) were used for development and replication of the factor models. The clinic sample consisted of 258 children (105 girls and 153 boys) who presented to a child anxiety disorders specialty clinic. The unselected, nonclinic sample consisted of 249 children (122 girls and 127 boys) enrolled in an elementary school. The results provided strong empirical support for a hierarchical multidimensional model with either three or four first-order factors. The two factors that emerged that appeared to be robust were Physical Concerns and Mental Incapacitation Concerns. What remains unresolved is whether Control of anxiety symptoms and Social Concerns are to be differentiated (as in the hierarchical model with four first-order factors) or not (as in the hierarchical model with three first-order factors). In addition to discussing this issue, the convergence of the present study's findings with past findings obtained with the ASI is discussed.
我们开发了童年焦虑敏感性指数的各种因素模型[西尔弗曼,W.K.,弗莱西格,W.,拉比安,B.和彼得森,R.A.(1991年)。童年焦虑敏感性指数。《临床儿童心理学杂志》,20,162 - 168],并在一个独立样本中测试了这些模型的拟合优度。主要关注的是检验一个问题,该问题表征了对成人版焦虑敏感性指数(即ASI)[赖斯,S.,彼得森,R.A.,古尔斯基,D.M.和麦克纳利,R.J.(1986年)。焦虑敏感性、焦虑频率与恐惧预测。《行为研究与治疗》,24,1 - 8]进行的因素分析研究,即儿童的焦虑敏感性是单维结构、正交多维结构还是层次结构?两个独立样本(一个临床样本和一个非临床样本)用于因素模型的开发和复制。临床样本由258名儿童(105名女孩和153名男孩)组成,他们前往一家儿童焦虑症专科诊所就诊。未经过筛选的非临床样本由249名就读于一所小学的儿童(122名女孩和127名男孩)组成。结果为具有三个或四个一阶因素的层次多维模型提供了强有力的实证支持。出现的两个似乎很稳健的因素是身体担忧和心理无能担忧。尚未解决的是,焦虑症状控制和社交担忧是否应加以区分(如在具有四个一阶因素的层次模型中)还是不应区分(如在具有三个一阶因素的层次模型中)。除了讨论这个问题外,还讨论了本研究结果与过去使用ASI获得的结果的一致性。