Ritter G
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Grenzgeb. 1976 Apr;44(4):151-81.
A review of social aspects of epilepsy is given. Similar to the own experience the literature shows only little social prestige given to patients with epilepsy, an experience known from persons with psychiatric disorders. The prevalence rate for chronic epilepsy is 0.5%. So called genuine seizures decreased with diagnostic progress during the last years (about 50%). Lower social classes and negative social patterns are characteristic of employees with epileptic fits. Unemployed persons show normal social structure. A relation to social class and onset of epilepsy exists. Epileptics are socially immobile. Like other persons with chronic diseases epilepsy produces a special social attitude and often negative therapeutic motivation. In contrast to the literature non-hospitalized epileptics show normal intelligence. Neurotic symptoms are seen in many cases however (about 40%). Often social disturbances origin from broken home situations. There is no specific social and mental defect. According to the own experience social integration of epileptics depends upon the local economic structure. The common prejudice varies with the local area. Social drop-outs are not due to the seizures, but occur mainly in mentally retarded persons who are not able to follow therapeutic regimens. Delinquency is increased among the own patients (18%). The causes are psychoorganic syndromes, often in connection with negative therapeutic motivation and alcoholism. The tendency to specific crimes, known from the literature, could not be confirmed. Forensic problems in direct connection with epileptic fits are rare. Medical problems concerning ability to drive often occur. Many patients possess a driver licence (46.5%), gained after onset of epilepsy in 50%. But the accident rate is lower than in the general population. Special outpatient departments and therapeutic groups for epileptics--affiliated to neurological centers--can improve the exact diagnosis, therapeutic motivation and social integration.
本文对癫痫的社会层面进行了综述。与自身经验相似,文献表明癫痫患者所获得的社会声望极低,这与精神疾病患者的情况相同。慢性癫痫的患病率为0.5%。在过去几年中,随着诊断技术的进步,所谓的真性癫痫发作有所减少(约50%)。癫痫发作的员工具有社会阶层较低和负面社会模式的特点。失业者的社会结构正常。癫痫的发作与社会阶层存在关联。癫痫患者在社会上流动性较差。与其他慢性病患者一样,癫痫会产生一种特殊的社会态度,且往往导致消极的治疗动机。与文献不同的是,非住院癫痫患者的智力正常。然而,在许多病例中可观察到神经症症状(约40%)。社会干扰往往源于家庭破裂的情况。不存在特定的社会和心理缺陷。根据自身经验,癫痫患者的社会融入取决于当地的经济结构。常见的偏见因地区而异。社会退缩并非由癫痫发作导致,主要发生在无法遵循治疗方案的智力迟钝者中。在作者的患者中,犯罪率有所上升(18%)。原因是精神器质性综合征,通常与消极的治疗动机和酗酒有关。文献中提到的特定犯罪倾向无法得到证实。与癫痫发作直接相关的法医问题很少见。与驾驶能力相关的医学问题经常出现。许多患者持有驾驶执照(46.5%),其中50%是在癫痫发作后获得的。但其事故率低于普通人群。隶属于神经科中心的癫痫患者特殊门诊和治疗小组可以改善准确诊断、治疗动机和社会融入情况。