Suppr超能文献

一种新的环丙沙星混悬液与阿莫西林克拉维酸片相比治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of a new ciprofloxacin suspension compared with co-amoxiclav tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Read R C, Kuss A, Berrisoul F, Kearsley N, Torres A, Kubin R

机构信息

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, U.K.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1999 Apr;93(4):252-61. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90021-5.

Abstract

A multinational, multicentre, randomized, prospective, parallel-group study compared treatment with ciprofloxacin administered as an oral suspension (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) with co-amoxiclav tablets (625 mg three times daily for 7 days) in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). A total of 147 of 165 cases treated with ciprofloxacin (89.1%) and 146 of 162 cases treated with co-amoxiclav (90.1%) were classified as being clinical successes at the primary efficacy assessment 7 days after the end of therapy (assessed as reduced cough, improvement in dyspnoea, reduction in 24-h sputum volume or reduced purulence of sputum). Treatment equivalence was statistically confirmed; treatment difference:--1.0%, 95% CI--6.6% and 4.5%. Before treatment, 128 bacterial strains were isolated from 103 patients (60 ciprofloxacin and 68 co-amoxiclav). The most commonly isolated organism was Haemophilus influenzae (60 isolates), followed by Moraxella catarrhalis (12 isolates), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11 isolates) and Staphylococcus aureus (10 isolates). At day 14, 40 of 46 ciprofloxacin-treated patients (87.0%) and 46 of 55 co-amoxiclav-treated patients (83.6%) who were valid for bacteriological analysis were classified as being bacteriological success (classed as eradication, eradication with colonization or presumed eradication; treatment difference: 3.3%, 95% CI--8.3% and 14.9%). The adverse event profile was comparable between treatment groups. Most adverse events considered possibly or probably related to study drug were related to the gastrointestinal system and were of mild or moderate severity: nausea (13% ciprofloxacin, 10.6% co-amoxiclav), flatulence (10.3% ciprofloxacin, 3.9% co-amoxiclav), abdominal pain (7.6% ciprofloxacin, 7.3% co-amoxiclav) and diarrhoea (4.3% ciprofloxacin, 6.7% co-amoxiclav). We concluded that a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin suspension is equivalent to a 7-day course of co-amoxiclav tablets in terms of clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of AECB. Thus, ciprofloxacin suspension may offer a suitable alternative treatment for AECB patients who have difficulty in swallowing, or who prefer liquid medications to tablets.

摘要

一项多国家、多中心、随机、前瞻性、平行组研究,比较了环丙沙星口服混悬液(500毫克,每日两次,共7天)与阿莫西林克拉维酸片(625毫克,每日三次,共7天)对慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)患者的治疗效果。在治疗结束7天后的主要疗效评估中,环丙沙星治疗的165例患者中有147例(89.1%),阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗的162例患者中有146例(90.1%)被分类为临床成功(评估为咳嗽减轻、呼吸困难改善、24小时痰量减少或痰液脓性减轻)。治疗等效性经统计学确认;治疗差异:-1.0%,95%置信区间-6.6%至4.5%。治疗前,从103例患者中分离出128株细菌菌株(60例环丙沙星治疗患者和68例阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗患者)。最常分离出的病原体是流感嗜血杆菌(60株),其次是卡他莫拉菌(12株)、肺炎链球菌(11株)和金黄色葡萄球菌(10株)。在第14天,46例接受环丙沙星治疗且可进行细菌学分析的患者中有40例(87.0%),55例接受阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗且可进行细菌学分析的患者中有46例(83.6%)被分类为细菌学成功(分类为根除、根除伴定植或假定根除;治疗差异:3.3%,95%置信区间-8.3%至14.9%)。治疗组之间的不良事件情况相当。大多数被认为可能或很可能与研究药物相关的不良事件与胃肠道系统有关,且为轻度或中度严重程度:恶心(环丙沙星组13%,阿莫西林克拉维酸组10.6%)、肠胃气胀(环丙沙星组10.3%,阿莫西林克拉维酸组3.9%)、腹痛(环丙沙星组7.6%,阿莫西林克拉维酸组7.3%)和腹泻(环丙沙星组4.3%,阿莫西林克拉维酸组6.7%)。我们得出结论,就治疗AECB的临床和细菌学疗效及耐受性而言,7天疗程的环丙沙星混悬液等同于7天疗程的阿莫西林克拉维酸片。因此,环丙沙星混悬液可能为吞咽困难或更喜欢液体制剂而非片剂的AECB患者提供一种合适的替代治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验