Schaberg T, Ballin I, Huchon G, Bassaris H, Hampel B, Reimnitz P
Lungenklinik, Diakoniekrankenhaus, Rotenburg, Germany.
J Int Med Res. 2001 Jul-Aug;29(4):314-28. doi: 10.1177/147323000102900408.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily dosing with moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) with that of coamoxiclav given three times daily for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Moxifloxacin (one 400 mg tablet daily) was administered orally for 5 days and co-amoxiclav (three 625 mg tablets daily) was given orally for 7 days. The study was randomized, non-blinded, multinational (12 countries) and multicentre (68 centres). A total of 575 patients, all with clear signs of AECB, were treated, 292 with moxifloxacin and 283 with co-amoxiclav. Of these, 512 patients were evaluable for efficacy (261 in the moxifloxacin group and 251 in the co-amoxiclav group). The primary efficacy parameter was clinical response at 14 days in the evaluable population. A clinical success was classified as resolution or improvement of symptoms. Variables used to assess clinical response included wheeze, cough, dyspnoea, sputum volume, rales and rhonchi. The success rate for moxifloxacin in the evaluable patients was 96.2% and that for co-amoxiclav was 91.6%. The 95% confidence intervals for this difference (0.4%; 8.7%) indicate equivalence in the treatments. Sputum samples were taken from patients and 140 of these contained a pathogen, Haemophilus influenzae being the most frequently isolated. Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae were also commonly isolated pathogens. The eradication rate at 14 days in the evaluable patients was 87.7% in the moxifloxacin group and 89.6% in the coamoxiclav group. Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant differences in the numbers of drug-related adverse events or the numbers of patients withdrawing because of an adverse event. These results and the broad spectrum of antibacterial activity make moxifloxacin a promising and safe alternative to conventional therapy for the empirical treatment of AECB.
本研究旨在比较每日一次服用莫西沙星(拜耳12 - 8039)与每日三次服用阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)的疗效和安全性。莫西沙星(每日1片400毫克)口服给药5天,阿莫西林克拉维酸(每日3片625毫克)口服给药7天。该研究为随机、非盲法、多国(12个国家)和多中心(68个中心)研究。共有575例均有明确AECB体征的患者接受治疗,其中292例使用莫西沙星,283例使用阿莫西林克拉维酸。其中,512例患者可评估疗效(莫西沙星组261例,阿莫西林克拉维酸组251例)。主要疗效参数为可评估人群中14天时的临床反应。临床成功定义为症状缓解或改善。用于评估临床反应的变量包括喘息、咳嗽、呼吸困难、痰量、啰音和哮鸣音。可评估患者中莫西沙星的成功率为96.2%,阿莫西林克拉维酸为91.6%。该差异的95%置信区间(0.4%;8.7%)表明治疗效果相当。从患者采集痰标本,其中140份含有病原体,最常分离出的是流感嗜血杆菌。卡他莫拉菌和肺炎链球菌也是常见的分离病原体。可评估患者中莫西沙星组14天时的根除率为87.7%,阿莫西林克拉维酸组为89.6%。两种药物耐受性均良好,药物相关不良事件数量或因不良事件退出的患者数量无显著差异。这些结果以及广泛的抗菌活性使莫西沙星成为AECB经验性治疗中传统疗法的一种有前景且安全的替代药物。