Nuutila M, Halmesmäki E, Hiilesmaa V, Ylikorkala O
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Sep;78(8):704-9.
Although induction of labor is a common procedure, there are limited data on its psychoemotional effects. We studied women's expectations of and experiences with labor induction in a large university hospital.
A total of 296 parturients were recruited, with 270 (91%) taken into the final analysis. Of these, 135 underwent elective induction of labor (44 with amniotomy and 91 with cervical ripening by the use of vaginal prostaglandin gel, followed by amniotomy), whereas the remaining 135 women gave birth spontaneously and served as controls. Each woman was interviewed as to her knowledge, expectations, and feelings about labor before induction or at start of labor (controls) as well as after delivery with the help of questionnaires containing yes/no or multiple-choice questions and visual analog scales.
The induction and control groups, in regard to baseline clinical characteristics, did not differ. Labor ended in cesarean section for 24 women in the induction group (18%) and for 12 women in the control group (9%) (p=0.04); these women were included in the data analysis. In the induction group, 67%, and in the control group, 48% of women (p=0.002) reported having received sufficient information on labor induction from medical personnel at prenatal or obstetric clinics. Attitudes towards induction of labor were antenatally positive in 78% of women in the induction group and in 69% in the control group. The induction group reported fear of pain less often (45%) than the control group (57%) (p=0.03). In the induction group, 76 women (56%), and in the control group 94 women (70%) (p=0.02), wanted to participate in the decision on the method of induction, and 74% and 83%, respectively, wished to influence the timing of induction. When interviewed post partum, the labor experience corresponded with the patients' expectations better in the control than in the induction group (p=0.03). Labor induction was a positive experience in 90% of women who underwent immediate amniotomy and in 69% of those who received prostaglandin ripening first.
Labor induction was a positive experience only seldom eliciting negative feelings. A third of the parturients undergoing induction need more information on the procedure and most want to participate in decision-making concerning the method and timing of induction.
尽管引产是一种常见的操作,但关于其心理情绪影响的数据有限。我们在一家大型大学医院研究了女性对引产的期望及经历。
共招募了296名产妇,其中270名(91%)纳入最终分析。其中,135名接受了择期引产(44例行人工破膜,91例行阴道前列腺素凝胶促宫颈成熟后行人工破膜),其余135名女性自然分娩作为对照。每位女性在引产或临产前(对照组)以及分娩后,通过包含是/否或多项选择题以及视觉模拟量表的问卷,接受关于其对分娩的了解、期望和感受的访谈。
引产组和对照组在基线临床特征方面无差异。引产组24名女性(18%)和对照组12名女性(9%)以剖宫产结束分娩(p = 0.04);这些女性被纳入数据分析。在引产组中,67%的女性,对照组中48%的女性(p = 0.002)报告在产前或产科诊所从医务人员那里获得了关于引产的充分信息。引产组中78%的女性和对照组中69%的女性在产前对引产持积极态度。引产组报告害怕疼痛的情况比对照组少(45%对57%)(p = 0.03)。在引产组中,76名女性(56%),对照组中94名女性(70%)(p = 0.02)希望参与引产方法的决策,且分别有74%和83%的女性希望影响引产时间。产后访谈时,对照组的分娩经历与患者期望的相符程度优于引产组(p = 0.03)。对于行即刻人工破膜的女性,90%认为引产是一次积极的经历,对于先接受前列腺素促宫颈成熟的女性,这一比例为69%。
引产很少引发负面情绪,总体是一次积极的经历。三分之一接受引产的产妇需要更多关于该操作的信息,且大多数希望参与关于引产方法和时间的决策。