• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引产:回顾过去,展望未来。

Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future.

作者信息

McCarthy Claire Marie, Meaney Sarah, McCarthy Michelle, Conners Nicole, Russell Noirin

机构信息

Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland (Dr C McCarthy, Dr M McCarthy, and Prof Russell).

National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland (Dr Meaney).

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Sep 16;2(4):100099. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099
PMID:36338538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9633735/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected.

RESULTS

There were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590; <.001), and were more likely to be induced for postmaturity (30.7%; n=78/254 vs 23.6%; 58/245; ≤.001). More than half (50.3%; 251/399) were induced before 40 weeks' gestation, irrespective of parity. Multiparous women and those induced for maternal medical indications had a shorter overall time to delivery interval (21.7 hours [standard deviation, 13.0] vs 13.8 hours [standard deviation, 11.2]; <.001 and 18.3 hours [standard deviation, 12.7] vs 14.7 hours [standard deviation, 12.4]; <.01).

CONCLUSION

Information on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making.

摘要

背景

接受引产的女性应获得准确信息。

目的

本研究旨在探讨引产的特征、指征及分娩结局,以指导临床实践和咨询。

研究设计

我们对爱尔兰共和国一家三级医院3个月内所有接受引产的单胎妊娠进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据来自纸质和电子登记册。对收集的数据进行描述性和推断性统计分析。

结果

共1084名女性分娩,引产率为46.0%(n = 499)。初产妇比经产妇更易接受引产(51.4%;n = 254/494 vs 41.5%;n = 245/590;P <.001),且因过期妊娠接受引产的比例更高(30.7%;n = 78/254 vs 23.6%;58/245;P≤.001)。超过一半(50.3%;251/399)的孕妇在妊娠40周前接受引产,与产次无关。经产妇和因母体医学指征接受引产的孕妇总分娩间隔时间较短(分别为21.7小时[标准差13.0] vs 13.8小时[标准差11.2];P <.001和18.3小时[标准差12.7] vs 14.7小时[标准差12.4];P <.01)。

结论

引产相关信息有助于指导和教育接受引产的女性,帮助临床医生进行恰当咨询,并促进共同决策。

相似文献

1
Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future.引产:回顾过去,展望未来。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Sep 16;2(4):100099. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
4
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.推荐的产程管理改变对预防初次剖宫产的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.病态肥胖女性的非医学指征引产与剖宫产风险增加无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.按预期分娩方式划分的早期早产先兆子痫结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):100.e1-100.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
7
Delivery outcomes in women undergoing elective labor induction at term.足月选择性引产的产妇分娩结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Mar;287(3):407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2582-1. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
8
Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.39 孕周选择性引产与低危经产妇期待管理的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):282-287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003371.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication.未明确指征的引产术后母婴结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;183(4):986-94. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106748.
10
Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.多产妇中使用和不使用催产素的宫颈成熟球囊:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):294.e1-294.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks: A Systematic Review.39周择期引产的新生儿结局:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 19;17(7):e88277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88277. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Timing of Prostin E2 Administration After Poor Response to Propess: Impact on Induction-to-Birth Interval and Maternal/Neonatal Outcomes.对普罗斯特(Propess)反应不佳后使用前列腺素E2的时机:对引产至分娩间隔及母婴结局的影响
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 10;61(7):1255. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071255.
3
Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of late gestation oral melatonin supplementation in reducing induction of labour rates in nulliparous women: the MyTIME study protocol.双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,以评估妊娠晚期口服褪黑素补充剂在降低初产妇引产率方面的有效性:MyTIME研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 23;15(1):e090370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090370.
4
Sleep disturbances in late pregnancy: associations with induction of labor.妊娠晚期睡眠障碍:与引产的关联。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):2045-2053. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07492-4. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
5
The Correct Indication to Induce Labour in a Swiss Cantonal Hospital.瑞士某州立医院引产的正确指征
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 14;12(20):6515. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206515.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of the induction to delivery time interval in vaginal dinoprostone-induced labor: a retrospective study in a Chinese tertiary maternity hospital.阴道用米索前列醇引产至分娩时间间隔的预测:一项在中国三级妇产医院开展的回顾性研究
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jun;47(6):2647-2654. doi: 10.1177/0300060519845780. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
3
Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: An observational study.妊娠38至39周经临床指征引产的初产妇结局:一项观察性研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;59(4):484-492. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12930. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Does an elective induction policy negatively impact on vaginal delivery rates? A 30-month review of an elective induction policy.选择性引产政策是否会对阴道分娩率产生负面影响?对一项选择性引产政策的30个月回顾。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):563-567. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1883-1. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.低危初产妇引产与期待管理的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
6
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.引产以改善足月及过期妊娠女性的分娩结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub4.
7
Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.高收入国家分娩干预措施的差异:一项跨国横断面研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e017993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017993.
8
Women's empowerment related to pregnancy and childbirth: introduction to special issue.与妊娠和分娩相关的妇女赋权:特刊引言
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 8;17(Suppl 2):352. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1490-6.
9
Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study.分娩诱导的临床决策差异:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 22;17(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1518-y.
10
Cesarean delivery as a marker for obstetric quality.剖宫产作为产科质量的一个指标。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):211-6. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000107.