Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后知情分娩决策辅助工具的随机对照试验:为分娩做出选择

Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.

作者信息

Shorten Allison, Shorten Brett, Keogh John, West Sandra, Morris Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Birth. 2005 Dec;32(4):252-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision-making about mode of birth after a cesarean delivery presents challenges to women and their caregivers and requires a balance of risks and benefits according to individual circumstances. The study objective was to determine whether a decision-aid for women who have experienced previous cesarean birth facilitates informed decision-making about birth options during a subsequent pregnancy.

METHOD

A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of 227 pregnant women was conducted within 3 prenatal clinics and 3 private obstetric practices in New South Wales, Australia. Women with 1 previous cesarean section and medically eligible for trial of vaginal birth were recruited at 12 to 18 weeks' gestation; 115 were randomized to the intervention group and 112 to the control group. A decision-aid booklet describing risks and benefits of elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor was given to intervention group women at 28 weeks' gestation. Main outcome measures included level of knowledge, decisional conflict score, women's preference for mode of birth, and recorded mode of birth.

RESULTS

Women who received the decision-aid demonstrated a significantly greater increase in mean knowledge scores than the control group (increasing by 2.17 vs 0.42 points on a 15-point scale) (p < 0.001, 95% CI for difference = 1.15-2.35). The intervention group demonstrated a reduction in decisional conflict score (p < 0.05). The decision-aid did not significantly affect the rate of uptake of trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean section. Preferences expressed at 36 weeks were not consistent with actual birth outcomes for many women.

CONCLUSION

A decision-aid for women facing choices about birth after cesarean section is effective in improving knowledge and reducing decisional conflict. However, little evidence suggested that this process led to an informed choice. Strategies are required to better equip organizations and practitioners to empower women so that they can translate informed preferences into practice. Further work needs to examine ways to enhance women's power in decision-making within the doctor-patient relationship.

摘要

背景

剖宫产术后分娩方式的决策给女性及其护理人员带来了挑战,需要根据个体情况权衡风险和益处。本研究的目的是确定为有剖宫产史的女性提供决策辅助工具是否有助于她们在后续妊娠期间就分娩选择做出明智的决策。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的3家产前诊所和3家私立产科机构进行了一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验,研究对象为227名孕妇。招募有1次剖宫产史且符合阴道分娩试验医学条件的女性,在妊娠12至18周时入组;115名被随机分配到干预组,112名被随机分配到对照组。在妊娠28周时,向干预组女性发放一本描述选择性再次剖宫产和试产的风险与益处的决策辅助手册。主要结局指标包括知识水平、决策冲突评分、女性对分娩方式的偏好以及记录的分娩方式。

结果

接受决策辅助工具的女性平均知识得分的增加幅度显著大于对照组(在15分制量表上分别增加2.17分和0.42分)(p<0.001,差异的95%置信区间为1.15 - 2.35)。干预组的决策冲突评分有所降低(p<0.05)。决策辅助工具对试产或选择性再次剖宫产的接受率没有显著影响。许多女性在36周时表达的偏好与实际分娩结局不一致。

结论

为面临剖宫产术后分娩选择的女性提供决策辅助工具可有效提高知识水平并减少决策冲突。然而,几乎没有证据表明这一过程能促成明智的选择。需要采取策略,使机构和从业者更好地帮助女性,使她们能够将明智的偏好转化为实际行动。还需要进一步研究如何在医患关系中增强女性的决策权力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验