Yokoya K, Takatsu H, Suzuki T, Hosokawa H, Ojio S, Matsubara T, Tanaka T, Watanabe S, Morita N, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Noda T, Minatoguchi S, Fujiwara H
MUGIC Group: Multicenter Study Group in Gifu University and Affiliated Hospitals on Cardiac Disease, Japan.
Circulation. 1999 Aug 31;100(9):903-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.9.903.
The process of progression in coronary artery disease is unknown.
The subjects were 36 patients with 36 objective vessels with clinically significant progression of coronary artery disease (>/=15% per year) in whom 4 serial coronary arteriograms (CAGs) were performed at intervals of approximately 4 months in a 1-year period. The degree of progression of percent stenosis between each of 2 serial CAGs was classified as marked (M: >/=15%), slight (S: 5% to 14%), and no progression (N: <5%). From the pattern of progression, the 36 vessels were classified as 14 type 1 vessels with marked progression (N-->N-->M in 13 vessels and S-->S-->M in 1 vessel) and 22 type 2 vessels without marked progression (S-->S-->S in 18 vessels, N-->S-->S in 4). Percent stenosis at the first, second, third, and final CAGs was 44+/-14%, 46+/-13%, 46+/-13%, and 88+/-10% (P<0.05 versus first CAG) in type 1 vessels and 44+/-11%, 50+/-9%, 59+/-9%, and 67+/-9% in type 2 vessels (P<0.05 for second, third, and final CAGs versus first CAG). Type 1 vessels featured the sudden appearance of severe stenosis due to marked progression, angina pectoris, or myocardial infarction (71%) and Ambrose type II eccentric lesions indicating plaque rupture or thrombi (57%). Type 2 vessels featured continuous slight progression of stenosis with smooth vessel walls; angina pectoris (14%) occurred when the percent stenosis reached a severe level. An increase in serum C-reactive protein was observed only in the type 2 vessel group, which suggests a relation between continuous slight progression and inflammatory change.
Two types of stenosis progression provide a new insight into the mechanism of coronary artery disease.
冠状动脉疾病的进展过程尚不清楚。
研究对象为36例患者的36条目标血管,这些血管存在具有临床意义的冠状动脉疾病进展(每年≥15%),在1年时间内每隔约4个月进行4次连续冠状动脉造影(CAG)。连续两次CAG之间狭窄百分比的进展程度分为显著(M:≥15%)、轻微(S:5%至14%)和无进展(N:<5%)。根据进展模式,36条血管被分为14条有显著进展的1型血管(13条血管为N→N→M,1条血管为S→S→M)和22条无显著进展的2型血管(18条血管为S→S→S,4条血管为N→S→S)。1型血管在首次、第二次、第三次和末次CAG时的狭窄百分比分别为44±14%、46±13%、46±13%和88±10%(与首次CAG相比,P<0.05),2型血管分别为44±11%、50±9%、59±9%和67±9%(第二次、第三次和末次CAG与首次CAG相比,P<0.05)。1型血管的特征是由于显著进展、心绞痛或心肌梗死导致严重狭窄突然出现(71%),以及提示斑块破裂或血栓形成的安布罗斯II型偏心病变(57%)。2型血管的特征是狭窄持续轻微进展且血管壁光滑;当狭窄百分比达到严重程度时出现心绞痛(14%)。仅在2型血管组中观察到血清C反应蛋白升高,这表明持续轻微进展与炎症变化之间存在关联。
两种类型的狭窄进展为冠状动脉疾病的机制提供了新的见解。