Quest for postdialysis urea rebound-equilibrated Kt/V with only intradialytic urea samples.

BACKGROUND

Postdialysis urea rebound (PDUR) is a cause of Kt/V overestimation when it is calculated from predialysis and the immediate postdialysis blood urea collections. Measuring PDUR requires a 30- or 60-minute postdialysis sampling, which is inconvenient. Several methods had been devised for a reasonable approach to determine PDUR-equilibrated Kt/V in short dialysis without the need for a delayed sample. The aim of our study was to compare these different Kt/V methods during the longer eight-hour hemodialysis sessions, and to determine the optimum intradialytic urea sample time that fits best with PDUR.

METHODS

The study included 21 patients (mean age 71.9 years) who were hemodialyzed for 60+/-60 months at three times eight hours weekly, using bicarbonate dialysate and cellulosic membranes. Blood urea samples were obtained at onset, and then at 17, 33, 50, 66, 75, 80, 85, and 100% of the dialysis session times, after 30 seconds of low flow, and then at 60-minutes postdialysis. All patients had a meal during dialysis. We compared four different formulas of Kt/V [(a) Kt/V-Smye with a 33% dialysis time urea sample, (b) two-pool equilibrated eKt/V, (c) Kt/V-std (Daugirdas-2) obtained with an immediate postdialytic sample, and (d) the different intradialytic urea samples for Kt/V (50, 66, 75, 80, and 85% of dialysis time)] with the equilibrated 60-minute PDUR Kt/V (Kt/V-r-60) formula as the reference method.

RESULTS

The mean PDUR was 17.2+/-9%, leading to an overestimation of Kt/V-std by 12.2%. Kt/V-r-60 was 1.68+/-0.34. Kt/V-std was 1.88+/-0.36 (Delta = 12.2+/-4.8%, r = 0.8). eKt/V was 1.77+/-0.3 (Delta = 5+/-5%, r = 0.96), and Kt/V-Smye was 1.79+/-0.47 (Delta = 5.2+/-14%, r = 0.9). The best time for the intradialytic sampling was 80% (that is, at 6 hr and 24 min). The Kt/V-80 was 1.64+/-0.3 and was best fitted with Kt/V-r-60 (Delta = -1.8+/-8%, r = 0.91). The mean intradialytic urea evolution showed a three-exponential rate, in discrepancy with the two-exponential rate theoretical model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that a significant postdialysis rebound exists in an eight-hour dialysis. An intradialytic urea sample taken at 80% of the total session time permits an estimation of the 60-minute Kt/V-rebound without the necessity of taking a delayed sample, with better accuracy than eKt/V or especially Kt/V-Smye. This may be related to a particular urea kinetics curve on the longer dialysis duration, which needs to be studied further.