Marsenić O, Peco-Antić A, Jovanović O
Pediatr Nephrol. 1999 Jun;13(5):418-22. doi: 10.1007/s004670050632.
Two methods have been suggested by Daugirdas and Schneditz (the rate equation), and Smye for predicting true equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) without the need for obtaining a blood sample 60 min after hemodialysis (HD). We compared the accuracy of these two methods when applied to pediatric HD. Thirty-eight standard pediatric HD sessions in 15 patients, (6 male, 9 female), aged 14.5+/-3.3 years, were analyzed. Kt/V was calculated by formal variable-volume single-pool urea kinetic model with post-HD urea taken at the end of HD (single-pool Kt/V), and with equilibrated urea (Ceq) taken 60 min after the end of HD (eKt/V). eKt/V was predicted by the rate equation from single-pool Kt/V and by the Smye method from predicted Ceq. Mean values obtained by both the rate equation (1.44+/-0.32, P>0.05) and by the Smye method (1.47+/-0.36, P>0.05) were similar to eKt/V (1.42+/-0.30), but correlation between results from the rate equation and eKt/V (r=0.863) was higher than between those from the Smye method and eKt/V (r=0.654). Average absolute error of the rate equation in predicting eKt/V was 0.118+/-0.114 (median 0.095) Kt/V units and 8.53%+/-8.36% (median 6.29%), while for the Smye method it was significantly higher [0.221+/-0.180 (median 0.190) Kt/V units, P=0.001; 16.49%+/-15.98% (median 11.88%) P=0.004]. High correlation between eKt/V and results from the rate equation indicates that urea rebound (expressed as delta Kt/V) is a function of the rate of dialysis (K/V). To test this, we analyzed the relationship of K/V and other parameters (session duration, body mass index, ultrafiltration rate, blood flow, and urea distribution volume) with delta Kt/V. The only significant (P<0.01) and highest correlation (r=0.442) was found for K/V. We conclude that in children on chronic HD, the rate equation is a better predictor of eKt/V than the Smye method, and that HD efficiency is the strongest determinant of postdialysis urea rebound in children.
Daugirdas和Schneditz(速率方程)以及Smye提出了两种无需在血液透析(HD)60分钟后采集血样就能预测真正平衡的Kt/V(eKt/V)的方法。我们比较了这两种方法应用于儿科HD时的准确性。分析了15例患者(6例男性,9例女性),年龄为14.5±3.3岁的38次标准儿科HD治疗。Kt/V通过正式的可变容积单池尿素动力学模型计算,HD结束时采集HD后尿素(单池Kt/V),HD结束60分钟后采集平衡尿素(Ceq)(eKt/V)。eKt/V通过速率方程从单池Kt/V预测,通过Smye方法从预测的Ceq预测。速率方程(1.44±0.32,P>0.05)和Smye方法(1.47±0.36,P>0.05)获得的平均值与eKt/V(1.42±0.30)相似,但速率方程结果与eKt/V之间的相关性(r=0.863)高于Smye方法结果与eKt/V之间的相关性(r=0.654)。速率方程预测eKt/V的平均绝对误差为0.118±0.114(中位数0.095)Kt/V单位和8.53%±8.36%(中位数6.29%),而Smye方法的平均绝对误差显著更高[0.221±0.180(中位数0.190)Kt/V单位,P=0.001;16.49%±15.98%(中位数11.88%),P=0.004]。eKt/V与速率方程结果之间的高相关性表明尿素反弹(表示为ΔKt/V)是透析速率(K/V)的函数。为了验证这一点,我们分析了K/V与其他参数(治疗持续时间、体重指数、超滤率、血流量和尿素分布容积)与ΔKt/V的关系。发现与K/V的相关性唯一显著(P<0.01)且最高(r=0.442)。我们得出结论,在慢性HD儿童中,速率方程比Smye方法更能准确预测eKt/V,并且HD效率是儿童透析后尿素反弹的最强决定因素。