Haier J, Nasralla M, Nicolson G L
The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA 92649, USA.
Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(12):1867-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690614.
Integrin-mediated tumour cell adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) components is an important step in the development of metastatic lesions. Thus, integrin expression and integrin-mediated adhesion of colon carcinoma cells to various ECM components was examined. Poorly (HT-29P) and highly (HT-29LMM) liver-metastatic colon carcinoma cells were used to study the rates of adhesion to collagen I (C I), collagen IV (C IV), laminin (LN), fibronectin (FN), or vitronectin (VN) in a static adhesion assay (10-120 min). Cells were untreated or treated with oligopeptides (RGD, GRGDS, YIGSR, RGES), anti-integrin antibodies, or colchicine, nocodazole, cycloheximide, acrylamide or cytochalasin D (to disrupt cytoskeletal structures). Both cell lines expressed similar patterns of integrin expression (alpha2, alpha3, ,alpha6, alphav, beta1, beta4, and beta5) by immunocytochemistry and immunoprecipitation. HT-29LMM cells showed significantly higher rates of adhesion to LN (P < 0.001) and FN (P < 0.001), but significantly poorer rates of adhesion to C I (P < 0.05) and C IV (P < 0.001) than HT-29P cells, respectively, adhesion to VN was insignificant. RGD and GRGDS inhibited HT-29LMM cell adhesion to FN only. Pretreatment with anti-beta, or anti-alpha2 integrin subunits suppressed adhesion to C I and C IV, and adhesion to LN was inhibited with anti-beta1 or anti-alpha6 integrin. Anti-beta1 or anti-alphav blocked adhesion to FN. Pretreatment of cells with cytochalasin D, cycloheximide or acrylamide inhibited adhesive interactions of both cell lines to the ECM components. In contrast, colchicine and nocodazole had no effect. The results demonstrate that adhesion of HT-29 cells to ECM is mediated, in part, by different integrins, depending on the substrate. Poorly and highly metastatic HT-29 cells possessed different patterns of adhesion to the various ECM substrates, but these differences were not due to different expression of integrin subunits. The results also suggested that the initial adhesion of poorly or highly metastatic HT-29 cells to ECM components requires, in part, the presence of native action and intermediate filaments, but not of microtubules. Thus the adhesion of tumour cells to ECM components may be dependent on signal transduction and assembly of microfilaments.
整合素介导的肿瘤细胞与细胞外基质(ECM)成分的黏附是转移病灶形成过程中的重要步骤。因此,研究了整合素的表达以及结肠癌细胞与各种ECM成分的整合素介导的黏附。采用低肝转移率(HT - 29P)和高肝转移率(HT - 29LMM)的结肠癌细胞,通过静态黏附试验(10 - 120分钟)研究其对I型胶原(C I)、IV型胶原(C IV)、层粘连蛋白(LN)、纤连蛋白(FN)或玻连蛋白(VN)的黏附率。细胞未处理或用寡肽(RGD、GRGDS、YIGSR、RGES)、抗整合素抗体或秋水仙碱、诺考达唑、环己酰亚胺、丙烯酰胺或细胞松弛素D处理(以破坏细胞骨架结构)。通过免疫细胞化学和免疫沉淀法检测,两种细胞系整合素表达模式相似(α2、α3、α6、αv、β1、β4和β5)。HT - 29LMM细胞对LN(P < 0.001)和FN(P < 0.001)的黏附率显著高于HT - 29P细胞,但对C I(P < 0.05)和C IV(P < 0.001)的黏附率显著低于HT - 29P细胞,对VN的黏附无显著差异。RGD和GRGDS仅抑制HT - 29LMM细胞对FN的黏附。用抗β或抗α2整合素亚基预处理可抑制对C I和C IV的黏附,用抗β1或抗α6整合素可抑制对LN的黏附。抗β1或抗αv可阻断对FN的黏附。用细胞松弛素D、环己酰亚胺或丙烯酰胺预处理细胞可抑制两种细胞系与ECM成分的黏附相互作用。相反,秋水仙碱和诺考达唑无作用。结果表明,HT - 29细胞与ECM的黏附部分是由不同的整合素介导的,这取决于底物。低转移和高转移的HT - 29细胞对各种ECM底物具有不同的黏附模式,但这些差异并非由于整合素亚基的不同表达所致。结果还表明,低转移或高转移的HT - 29细胞对ECM成分的初始黏附部分需要天然作用和中间丝的存在,但不需要微管。因此,肿瘤细胞与ECM成分的黏附可能依赖于信号转导和微丝的组装。