Hendrix M J, Seftor E A, Chu Y W, Trevor K T, Seftor R E
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1109, USA.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1996 Dec;15(4):507-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00054016.
The expression of intermediate filament proteins is remarkably tissue-specific which suggests that the intermediate filament (IF) type(s) present in cells is somehow related to their biological function. However, in some cancers-particularly malignant melanoma and breast carcinoma, there is a strong indication that vimentin and keratin IFs are coexpressed, thus presenting as a dedifferentiated or interconverted (between epithelial and mesenchymal) phenotype. In this review, two in vitro models are presented which recapitulate the interconverted phenotype in human melanoma and breast carcinoma, and allow, for the first time, unique observations to be made with respect to the role of IFs in cancer progression. These studies have provided direct evidence linking overexpression of keratin IFs in human melanoma with increased migratory and invasive activity in vitro, which can be down-regulated by substituting dominant-negative keratin mutants. Overexpression of vimentin IFs in the breast carcinoma model leads to augmentation of motility and invasiveness in vitro, which can be transiently down-regulated by treatment with antisense oligonucleotides to vimentin. Additional experimental evidence suggests that the mechanism(s) responsible for the differential expression of metastatic properties associated with the interconverted phenotype rest(s) in the unique interaction, either direct or indirect, of IFs with specific integrins interacting with the extracellular matrix. In this review, we discuss the observations derived from the human melanoma and breast carcinoma models to address the hypothesis that the ability to coexpress vimentin and keratins confers a selective advantage to tumor cells in their interpretation of and response to signaling cues from the extracellular matrix. The ramifications of these observations are discussed with respect to the patholophysiology of the respective in situ tumors.
中间丝蛋白的表达具有显著的组织特异性,这表明细胞中存在的中间丝(IF)类型在某种程度上与其生物学功能相关。然而,在某些癌症中,尤其是恶性黑色素瘤和乳腺癌,有强有力的证据表明波形蛋白和角蛋白中间丝会共同表达,从而呈现出去分化或相互转化(上皮和间充质之间)的表型。在本综述中,介绍了两种体外模型,它们重现了人类黑色素瘤和乳腺癌中的相互转化表型,并首次使人们能够就中间丝在癌症进展中的作用进行独特的观察。这些研究提供了直接证据,将人类黑色素瘤中角蛋白中间丝的过表达与体外迁移和侵袭活性的增加联系起来,通过替换显性负性角蛋白突变体可以下调这种活性。在乳腺癌模型中波形蛋白中间丝的过表达导致体外运动性和侵袭性增强,用波形蛋白反义寡核苷酸处理可使其暂时下调。更多实验证据表明,与相互转化表型相关的转移特性差异表达的机制在于中间丝与特定整合素(与细胞外基质相互作用)的直接或间接独特相互作用。在本综述中,我们讨论了从人类黑色素瘤和乳腺癌模型中得出的观察结果,以探讨波形蛋白和角蛋白共同表达的能力在肿瘤细胞解读和响应来自细胞外基质的信号线索方面赋予其选择性优势这一假说。还讨论了这些观察结果对各自原位肿瘤病理生理学的影响。