Ahmed S F, Hughes I A
Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge Clinical School, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK.
J R Soc Med. 1999 Jun;92(6):293-8. doi: 10.1177/014107689909200607.
Medical students at the Cambridge Clinical School are provided with a list of 42 core conditions they should encounter and 20 core skills they should perform during their attachment. By self-completion questionnaires we assessed their clinical experience and the amount of teaching they received, relating the results to marks gained in end-of-attachment assessments. 103 (93%) of 110 students in year one and 123 (96%) of 128 in year two completed the questionnaires. Of the 42 core conditions, 13 were seen by under 70% of the students in year one. In year two, exposure rate increased for 26 core conditions by a median of 7% (range 2-40) and decreased in 13 core conditions by a median value 4% (range 5-13) (P = 0.0005, chi 2). Only mandatory core skills were performed by over 90% of students. 5% of students did not perform any newborn examinations and under 60% observed neonatal resuscitation or a high-risk delivery. Students' core condition score was associated with their core skill score (r = 0.5), hospital grade (r = 0.3) and exposure to acute paediatrics (r = 0.3) (P < 0.005). There was no significant association between clinical experience and the objective examination score or the amount of teaching received. There was an inverse association between the number of students at a hospital and the number of core conditions with an exposure rate above 70% at that hospital (r = 0.7, P < 0.05). This study suggests that clinical experience may be better judged by the clinical supervisor than by assessment of theoretical knowledge.
剑桥临床学院的医学生收到一份清单,列出了他们在实习期间应该接触到的42种核心病症以及应该掌握的20项核心技能。通过自行填写问卷,我们评估了他们的临床经验以及接受教学的量,并将结果与实习结束评估中的成绩相关联。一年级的110名学生中有103名(93%)、二年级的128名学生中有123名(96%)完成了问卷。在42种核心病症中,一年级不到70%的学生接触过其中13种。在二年级,26种核心病症的接触率中位数提高了7%(范围为2%-40%),13种核心病症的接触率中位数下降了4%(范围为5%-13%)(P = 0.0005,卡方检验)。只有强制性的核心技能有超过90%的学生掌握。5%的学生没有进行任何新生儿检查,不到60%的学生观摩过新生儿复苏或高危分娩。学生的核心病症得分与他们的核心技能得分相关(r = 0.5)、与医院评分相关(r = 0.3)以及与接触急性儿科学的情况相关(r = 0.3)(P < 0.005)。临床经验与客观考试成绩或接受教学的量之间没有显著关联。医院的学生数量与该医院接触率高于70%的核心病症数量之间存在负相关(r = 0.7,P < 0.05)。这项研究表明,临床经验由临床督导判断可能比通过理论知识评估更好。