• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两性霉素B常规制剂与脂质体制剂的比较综述

A comparative review of conventional and lipid formulations of amphotericin B.

作者信息

Robinson R F, Nahata M C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital and College of Pharmacy, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999 Aug;24(4):249-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1999.00220.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2710.1999.00220.x
PMID:10475983
Abstract

Over the past 15 years, factors suh as corticosteroid treatment, cytotoxic chemotherapy, excessive use of broad spectrum antibiotics and HIV have led to an increased risk of serious fungal infections in both adults and pediatric patients. This increase in invasive fungal infections poses increasing difficulty in their treatment. Three new lipid formulations of amphotericin B are now available in the U.S.: amphotericin B lipid complex (Abelcet), amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphotec), and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome). These newer formulations are substantially more expensive, but allow patients to receive higher doses for longer periods of time with decreased renal toxicity than conventional amphotericin B. The properties of these new agents are summarized in this review. Discussion of current national guidelines as well as those used at our institution are presented to provide guidance for the development of institution specific guidelines for the most cost-effective drug for most patients, some may benefit more from one of the newer lipid formulations.

摘要

在过去15年中,诸如皮质类固醇治疗、细胞毒性化疗、过度使用广谱抗生素以及感染艾滋病毒等因素,导致成人和儿童患者发生严重真菌感染的风险增加。侵袭性真菌感染的这种增加给其治疗带来了越来越大的困难。目前在美国有三种新的两性霉素B脂质制剂:两性霉素B脂质复合体(Abelcet)、两性霉素B胶体分散体(Amphotec)和脂质体两性霉素B(安必素)。这些较新的制剂价格要贵得多,但与传统两性霉素B相比,能让患者接受更高剂量、更长时间的治疗,同时降低肾毒性。本文综述了这些新药的特性。还介绍了当前的国家指南以及我们机构所使用的指南,以便为制定针对大多数患者最具成本效益药物的机构特定指南提供指导,有些患者可能会从较新的脂质制剂之一中获益更多。

相似文献

1
A comparative review of conventional and lipid formulations of amphotericin B.两性霉素B常规制剂与脂质体制剂的比较综述
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999 Aug;24(4):249-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1999.00220.x.
2
Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity.两性霉素 B 制剂:疗效和毒性的比较评价。
Drugs. 2013 Jun;73(9):919-34. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4.
3
The lipid formulations of amphotericin B.两性霉素B的脂质制剂
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Aug;4(8):1277-87. doi: 10.1517/14656566.4.8.1277.
4
Amphotericin B and its new formulations: pharmacologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability.两性霉素B及其新制剂:药理学特性、临床疗效和耐受性。
Transpl Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;1(4):273-83. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3062.1999.010406.x.
5
Overview of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B.两性霉素B脂质制剂概述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Feb;49 Suppl 1:31-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.31.
6
[Lipid formulations of amphotericin].两性霉素的脂质制剂
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2014 Oct;31(5):518-27. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182014000500002.
7
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B.两性霉素B的脂质制剂
Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 2000;20:1-23.
8
The current role of amphotericin B lipid complex in managing systemic fungal infections.两性霉素 B 脂质复合物在治疗系统性真菌感染中的作用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):3011-20. doi: 10.1185/03007990903379077.
9
What is the current and future status of conventional amphotericin B?传统两性霉素B的现状及未来发展趋势如何?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jun;27 Suppl 1:12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 May 16.
10
Liposomal formulations of amphotericin B: differences according to the scientific evidence.两性霉素B的脂质体制剂:基于科学证据的差异
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Dec;28(6):275-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Next-generation antifungal drugs: Mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical prospects.新一代抗真菌药物:作用机制、疗效及临床前景。
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2025 Aug;15(8):3852-3887. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.06.013. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Liposome-Mediated Anti-Viral Drug Delivery Across Blood-Brain Barrier: Can Lipid Droplet Target Be Game Changers?脂质体介导的抗逆病毒药物经血脑屏障传递:脂滴靶点可否成为改变游戏规则者?
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023 Dec 20;44(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01443-4.
3
Recent Advances of Ocular Drug Delivery Systems: Prominence of Ocular Implants for Chronic Eye Diseases.
眼部给药系统的最新进展:眼用植入物在慢性眼病治疗中的突出地位。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):1746. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061746.
4
Polyene Antibiotics Physical Chemistry and Their Effect on Lipid Membranes; Impacting Biological Processes and Medical Applications.多烯抗生素的物理化学性质及其对脂质膜的影响;对生物过程和医学应用的影响
Membranes (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;12(7):681. doi: 10.3390/membranes12070681.
5
Preparation, Characterization, and In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study of the Supercritical Fluid-Processed Liposomal Amphotericin B.超临界流体处理的两性霉素B脂质体的制备、表征及体内药代动力学研究
Pharmaceutics. 2019 Nov 8;11(11):589. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11110589.
6
Getting into the brain: liposome-based strategies for effective drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier.进入大脑:基于脂质体的跨越血脑屏障的有效药物递送策略。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2016 Oct 18;11:5381-5414. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S117210. eCollection 2016.
7
Efficacies of amphotericin B (AMB) lipid complex, AMB colloidal dispersion, liposomal AMB, and conventional AMB in treatment of murine coccidioidomycosis.两性霉素B(AMB)脂质复合物、AMB胶体分散体、脂质体AMB及传统AMB治疗小鼠球孢子菌病的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun;48(6):2140-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2140-2143.2004.
8
Efficacy of orally delivered cochleates containing amphotericin B in a murine model of aspergillosis.含两性霉素B的口服耳蜗脂质体在小鼠曲霉病模型中的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Aug;46(8):2704-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2704-2707.2002.
9
Molecular evaluation of the plasma membrane proton pump from Aspergillus fumigatus.烟曲霉质膜质子泵的分子评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Mar;46(3):615-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.3.615-624.2002.
10
Efficacy of oral cochleate-amphotericin B in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis.口服卷曲两性霉素B在系统性念珠菌病小鼠模型中的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Sep;44(9):2356-60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2356-2360.2000.