Jordan K G
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and Jordan NeuroScience, San Bernardino, California 92404, USA.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;16(4):332-40; discussion 353. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199907000-00005.
Whether or not nonconvulsive status epilepticus produces permanent brain damage is a source of controversy. Contributing to the controversy is the lack of clarity for classifying the clinical and electrographic phenomena that constitute nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus commonly occurs in the context of an acute brain injury. For example, it commonly persists in generalized convulsive status epilepticus after convulsive activity has stopped, and it is not uncommonly associated with acute cerebral ischemia. Its clinical characteristics are ambiguous, subtle, and nonspecific making the diagnosis difficult. In the absence of EEG testing, it is likely to be missed or delayed. When acute brain injury and nonconvulsive status epilepticus occur concurrently, the severity of acute brain injury has traditionally been accepted as determining patient outcome. However, increasing evidence suggests that the two conditions are synergistically detrimental and increase brain injury. Guidelines remain to be established for the intensity and duration of anticonvulsant therapy in these patients. Evidence suggests that, in the absence of extreme and irreversible acute brain injury, early intensive intervention is necessary to improve the otherwise poor outcome of these patients.
非惊厥性癫痫持续状态是否会导致永久性脑损伤是一个存在争议的问题。造成这种争议的原因是,对于构成非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的临床和脑电图现象,缺乏明确的分类标准。非惊厥性癫痫持续状态通常发生在急性脑损伤的情况下。例如,它通常在惊厥活动停止后持续存在于全身性惊厥性癫痫持续状态中,并且常与急性脑缺血相关。其临床特征模糊、细微且不具特异性,这使得诊断困难。在没有脑电图检测的情况下,很可能会漏诊或延误诊断。当急性脑损伤和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态同时发生时,传统上认为急性脑损伤的严重程度决定患者的预后。然而,越来越多的证据表明,这两种情况会产生协同损害,加重脑损伤。对于这些患者抗惊厥治疗的强度和持续时间,仍有待制定指导方针。有证据表明,在不存在极端且不可逆的急性脑损伤的情况下,早期强化干预对于改善这些患者原本不佳的预后是必要的。