Dror I E, Busemeyer J R, Basola B
Department of Psychology, Southampton University, Highfield Southampton, England.
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):713-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03211564.
Choice probability and choice response time data from a risk-taking decision-making task were compared with predictions made by a sequential sampling model. The behavioral data, consistent with the model, showed that participants were less likely to take an action as risk levels increased, and that time pressure did not have a uniform effect on choice probability. Under time pressure, participants were more conservative at the lower risk levels but were more prone to take risks at the higher levels of risk. This crossover interaction reflected a reduction of the threshold within a single decision strategy rather than a switching of decision strategies. Response time data, as predicted by the model, showed that participants took more time to make decisions at the moderate risk levels and that time pressure reduced response time across all risk levels, but particularly at the those risk levels that took longer time with no pressure. Finally, response time data were used to rule out the hypothesis that time pressure effects could be explained by a fast-guess strategy.
将来自冒险决策任务的选择概率和选择反应时间数据与顺序抽样模型所做的预测进行了比较。与该模型一致的行为数据表明,随着风险水平的增加,参与者采取行动的可能性降低,并且时间压力对选择概率没有统一的影响。在时间压力下,参与者在较低风险水平时更为保守,但在较高风险水平时更倾向于冒险。这种交叉交互反映了单一决策策略内阈值的降低,而不是决策策略的切换。如模型所预测的那样,反应时间数据表明,参与者在中等风险水平下做出决策花费的时间更多,并且时间压力减少了所有风险水平下的反应时间,尤其是在无压力时花费时间较长的那些风险水平下。最后,反应时间数据被用于排除时间压力效应可由快速猜测策略解释的假设。