Suppr超能文献

使用压平式眼压计和心音图法测量健康受试者中心主动脉血压的可重复性。

The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography.

作者信息

Siebenhofer A, Kemp C, Sutton A, Williams B

机构信息

University of Leicester, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Sep;13(9):625-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000887.

Abstract

AIM

Sphygmocardiography via applanation tonometry is a non-invasive, bedside technology which utilises tonometric analysis of the radial artery pulse wave and measurement of peripheral arterial blood pressure (BP) to derive a central arterial pulse wave, central arterial BP and related indices. The present study was designed to determine: (1) the inter-operator variability in measurements obtained using this technique; (2) the relationship between measured peripheral arterial BP and derived central arterial BP.

METHOD

Multiple measurements were made from 25 healthy subjects (15 male), mean age 33 (s.d. 10.3) years, mean arterial BP 90 (s.d. 12) mm Hg by two trained observers at the same time of day on three separate occasions.

RESULTS

The mean inter-operator difference was 0.1 (s.d. 1.7) mm Hg for derived systolic aortic BP and 0.1 (s.d. 0.7) mm Hg for derived diastolic aortic BP (Bland and Altman analysis). Pulse wave Augmentation Index (AIx) values, ranged from -22% to +40%, with the inter-operator measurement difference being only 0.4 (s.d. 6.4)%. Buckberg ratio measurements ranged from 119% to 254%, with the inter-operator measurement difference being only 2.7 (s.d. 15.4)%. The relationship between derived central systolic BP and peripheral systolic BP readings in individual patients was not constant and showed significant variance when compared on different days (ANOVA, P = 0.03). This was not explained by any significant variance in heart rate (ANOVA, P = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

Applanation tonometry has excellent inter-observer reproducibility when used by trained observers. Moreover, the inconsistency in the relationship between peripheral and central aortic BP suggests that the former is not a perfect surrogate for the latter. Further prospective studies are required to define whether derived central aortic BP may be a better predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and the impact of different antihypertensive therapies on the relationship between peripheral and central arterial BP.

摘要

目的

通过压平式眼压测量法进行心音图描记是一种非侵入性的床边技术,它利用对桡动脉脉搏波的眼压测量分析和外周动脉血压(BP)测量来得出中心动脉脉搏波、中心动脉血压及相关指标。本研究旨在确定:(1)使用该技术获得的测量值在不同操作者之间的变异性;(2)测量的外周动脉血压与得出的中心动脉血压之间的关系。

方法

25名健康受试者(15名男性),平均年龄33(标准差10.3)岁,平均动脉血压90(标准差12)mmHg,由两名经过培训的观察者在一天中的同一时间,分三次进行多次测量。

结果

对于得出的收缩期主动脉血压,不同操作者之间的平均差异为0.1(标准差1.7)mmHg,对于得出的舒张期主动脉血压,不同操作者之间的平均差异为0.1(标准差0.7)mmHg(布兰德-奥特曼分析)。脉搏波增强指数(AIx)值范围为-22%至+40%,不同操作者之间的测量差异仅为0.4(标准差6.4)%。巴克伯格比值测量范围为119%至254%,不同操作者之间的测量差异仅为2.7(标准差15.4)%。个体患者中得出的中心收缩压与外周收缩压读数之间的关系并不恒定,在不同日期进行比较时显示出显著差异(方差分析,P = 0.03)。心率方面无任何显著差异无法解释这一现象(方差分析,P = 0.39)。

结论

经过培训的观察者使用压平式眼压测量法时具有出色的观察者间可重复性。此外,外周与中心主动脉血压之间关系的不一致表明前者并非后者的完美替代指标。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定得出的中心主动脉血压是否可能是心血管发病率和死亡率的更好预测指标,以及不同降压治疗对外周与中心动脉血压关系的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验