Suppr超能文献

单独及联合使用临床和实验室参数鉴别难治性牙周炎患者。

Discrimination of refractory periodontitis subjects using clinical and laboratory parameters alone and in combination.

作者信息

Colombo A P, Haffajee A D, Smith C M, Cugini M A, Socransky S S

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Sep;26(9):569-76. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260902.x.

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was to use baseline clinical and laboratory parameters to distinguish subjects refractory to conventional periodontal therapy. Baseline clinical, microbial and host parameters were compared in 61 successfully-treated and 27 refractory subjects. Refractory subjects showed mean full-mouth attachment level (AL) loss and/or >3 sites with new AL loss >2.5 mm within 1 year after both scaling and root planing and surgery with systemic tetracycline. Successfully-treated subjects showed mean AL gain and no sites with new AL loss >2.5 mm after either regimen. Gingival redness, bleeding on probing, suppuration, supragingival plaque accumulation, pocket depth and AL were measured at 6 sites per tooth in each subject. The levels of 40 subgingival taxa were determined in subgingival plaque samples from up to 28 sites in each subject using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. Serum antibody (Ab) to 85 subgingival species was determined using checkerboard immunoblotting. Levels of serum IgG2 and Gm23 allotype were measured using radial immunodiffusion; FcgammaRIIa and FcgammaRIIIb receptor haplotypes were determined using PCR and allele specific oligonucleotide probes. Odds ratios of a subject being refractory were determined by comparing measured parameters in the 2 subject groups using univariate and multivariate techniques. 17 of 151 clinical, microbial and immunological variables were significant using chi2 analysis after adjusting for multiple comparisons. For example, the odds ratios of a subject being refractory were 12.2, 5.4 and 6.9 if the subject had Ab >50 microg/ml to >9 species; S. constellatus counts >2.4% of the total DNA probe count or >2.1% of sites with AL >6 mm. The 17 significant predictor variables were used in logistic regression and discriminant analyses. Similar variables were selected using both analyses including the number of serum Ab to subgingival species >50 microg/ml, % S. constellatus in plaque samples and % sites with attachment loss >6 mm. In the logistic regression analysis model, the odds ratios associated with >9 species exhibiting >Ab 50 microg/ml, >2.1% of sites with AL >6 mm and >2.4% S. constellatus in plaque were 8.7, 6.8 and 2.4, respectively, after adjusting for other variables in the model. Discriminant analysis using these variables provided sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 0.66, 0.92, 0.80 and 0.85 respectively. Refractory periodontitis subjects could be distinguished using a subset of clinical, microbiological and immunological parameters.

摘要

本研究的目的是利用基线临床和实验室参数来区分对传统牙周治疗无效的受试者。对61例成功治疗的受试者和27例治疗无效的受试者的基线临床、微生物和宿主参数进行了比较。治疗无效的受试者在进行龈下刮治和根面平整以及全身应用四环素治疗后的1年内,平均全口附着丧失(AL)增加,和/或有超过3个部位出现新的AL丧失超过2.5 mm。成功治疗的受试者在接受任何一种治疗方案后,平均AL增加,且没有部位出现新的AL丧失超过2.5 mm。在每个受试者的每颗牙齿的6个部位测量牙龈红肿、探诊出血、化脓、龈上菌斑积聚、牙周袋深度和AL。使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术在每个受试者多达28个部位的龈下菌斑样本中测定40种龈下微生物分类群的水平。使用棋盘式免疫印迹法测定血清针对85种龈下菌种的抗体(Ab)。使用放射免疫扩散法测量血清IgG2和Gm23同种异型的水平;使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和等位基因特异性寡核苷酸探针确定FcγRIIa和FcγRIIIb受体单倍型。通过使用单变量和多变量技术比较两组受试者的测量参数,确定受试者治疗无效的比值比。在对多重比较进行校正后,使用卡方分析,151个临床、微生物和免疫学变量中的17个具有显著性。例如,如果受试者针对超过9种菌种的Ab>50μg/ml;星座链球菌计数>总DNA探针计数 的2.4%或在附着丧失>6 mm的部位中占>2.1%,则该受试者治疗无效的比值比分别为12.2、5.4和6.9。将这17个显著的预测变量用于逻辑回归和判别分析。两种分析都选择了相似的变量,包括血清针对龈下菌种的Ab>50μg/ml的数量、菌斑样本中星座链球菌的百分比以及附着丧失>6 mm的部位的百分比。在逻辑回归分析模型中,在对模型中的其他变量进行校正后,与超过9种菌种且Ab>50μg/ml、附着丧失>6 mm的部位>2.1%以及菌斑中星座链球菌>2.4%相关的比值比分别为8.7、6.8和2.4。使用这些变量进行判别分析,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.66、0.92、0.80和0.85。可以使用临床、微生物学和免疫学参数的一个子集来区分难治性牙周炎受试者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验