Georgopoulos S K, Schwartz L H, Jarnagin W R, Gerdes H, Breite I, Fong Y, Blumgart L H, Kurtz R C
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Arch Surg. 1999 Sep;134(9):1002-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1002.
We hypothesize that magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is comparable to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic (ERCP) as a diagnostic tool in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
Eighteen patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary malignancy were evaluated by ERCP and MRCP in 8 months (March 1, 1996, to October 31, 1996). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was performed with a 1.5-T scanner using 4-mm slices. Images were obtained in a 14- to 28-second breath-hold. Images from MRCP were retrospectively evaluated by a radiologist for image quality, ductal dilation, level of obstruction, and overall diagnostic impression. Images from ERCP were retrospectively evaluated by a biliary endoscopist (L.H.S.) and served as the standard for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values. In addition, intraoperative findings were compared with MRCP results in all patients explored.
Diagnostic-quality MR images were obtained in 18 patients (100%). Diagnostic-quality endoscopic images were obtained in 16 (89%) of 18 attempted biliary cannulations and 11 (78%) of 14 attempted pancreatic cannulations. Magnetic resonance CP accurately delineated the level of extrahepatic biliary ductal obstruction in 13 (87%) of 15 patients. More important, MRCP provided valuable staging information in most patients. Findings from MRCP correlated with operative findings (size and location of tumor and mesenteric vascular involvement) in 8 (80%) of 10 patients who underwent surgery, while failing in 2 patients (20%) with carcinomatosis.
Magnetic resonance CP is a sensitive study for detecting the presence and level of biliary ductal obstruction in patients with cancer. The results are comparable to those of ERCP; however, MRCP provides additional data regarding extent of disease that is not available from ERCP alone.
我们假设磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)作为一种诊断工具,在恶性胆管梗阻患者中与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)具有可比性。
1996年3月1日至1996年10月31日的8个月内,对18例疑似胰胆管恶性肿瘤患者进行了ERCP和MRCP评估。使用1.5-T扫描仪,以4毫米层厚进行磁共振胰胆管造影。在14至28秒的屏气状态下获取图像。放射科医生对MRCP图像进行回顾性评估,评估内容包括图像质量、胆管扩张、梗阻部位以及总体诊断印象。胆管内镜医生(L.H.S.)对ERCP图像进行回顾性评估,并将其作为计算敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值的标准。此外,将所有接受手术患者的术中发现与MRCP结果进行比较。
18例患者(100%)均获得了诊断质量的MR图像。18例尝试胆管插管的患者中有16例(89%)获得了诊断质量的内镜图像,14例尝试胰管插管的患者中有11例(78%)获得了诊断质量的内镜图像。磁共振胰胆管造影准确显示了15例患者中13例(87%)肝外胆管梗阻的部位。更重要的是,MRCP在大多数患者中提供了有价值的分期信息。10例接受手术的患者中8例(80%)的MRCP结果与手术结果(肿瘤大小和位置以及肠系膜血管受累情况)相关,而2例(20%)有癌转移的患者结果不相符。
磁共振胰胆管造影是检测癌症患者胆管梗阻的存在及部位的一项敏感检查。其结果与ERCP相当;然而,MRCP提供了关于疾病范围的额外数据,这是单独的ERCP无法提供的。