Lue L F, Kuo Y M, Roher A E, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L, Beach T, Kurth J H, Rydel R E, Rogers J
Roberts Center, Sun City, Arizona, USA.
Am J Pathol. 1999 Sep;155(3):853-62. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x.
We have characterized amyloid beta peptide (Abeta) concentration, Abeta deposition, paired helical filament formation, cerebrovascular amyloid angiopathy, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) allotype, and synaptophysin concentration in entorhinal cortex and superior frontal gyrus of normal elderly control (ND) patients, Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and high pathology control (HPC) patients who meet pathological criteria for AD but show no synapse loss or overt antemortem symptoms of dementia. The measures of Abeta deposition, Abeta-immunoreactive plaques with and without cores, thioflavin histofluorescent plaques, and concentrations of insoluble Abeta, failed to distinguish HPC from AD patients and were poor correlates of synaptic change. By contrast, concentrations of soluble Abeta clearly distinguished HPC from AD patients and were a strong inverse correlate of synapse loss. Further investigation revealed that Abeta40, whether in soluble or insoluble form, was a particularly useful measure for classifying ND, HPC, and AD patients compared with Abeta42. Abeta40 is known to be elevated in cerebrovascular amyloid deposits, and Abeta40 (but not Abeta42) levels, cerebrovascular amyloid angiopathy, and ApoE4 allele frequency were all highly correlated with each other. Although paired helical filaments in the form of neurofibrillary tangles or a penumbra of neurites surrounding amyloid cores also distinguished HPC from AD patients, they were less robust predictors of synapse change compared with soluble Abeta, particularly soluble Abeta40. Previous experiments attempting to relate Abeta deposition to the neurodegeneration that underlies AD dementia may have failed because they assayed the classical, visible forms of the molecule, insoluble neuropil plaques, rather than the soluble, unseen forms of the molecule.
我们已对正常老年对照(ND)患者、阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者以及符合AD病理标准但无突触丧失或明显生前痴呆症状的高病理对照(HPC)患者的内嗅皮质和额上回中的β淀粉样肽(Aβ)浓度、Aβ沉积、双螺旋丝形成、脑血管淀粉样血管病、载脂蛋白E(ApoE)同种异型以及突触素浓度进行了特征分析。Aβ沉积的测量指标,包括有核心和无核心的Aβ免疫反应性斑块、硫黄素组织荧光斑块以及不溶性Aβ的浓度,未能将HPC患者与AD患者区分开来,并且与突触变化的相关性较差。相比之下,可溶性Aβ的浓度能明显区分HPC患者与AD患者,并且与突触丧失呈强烈的负相关。进一步研究表明,与Aβ42相比,Aβ40无论是可溶性还是不溶性形式,都是对ND、HPC和AD患者进行分类的特别有用的指标。已知Aβ40在脑血管淀粉样沉积物中升高,并且Aβ40(而非Aβ42)水平、脑血管淀粉样血管病和ApoE4等位基因频率彼此高度相关。尽管以神经原纤维缠结形式存在的双螺旋丝或围绕淀粉样核心的神经突半影也能区分HPC患者与AD患者,但与可溶性Aβ,尤其是可溶性Aβ40相比,它们作为突触变化预测指标的可靠性较低。先前试图将Aβ沉积与AD痴呆所基于的神经退行性变联系起来的实验可能失败了,因为它们检测的是该分子的经典可见形式,即不溶性神经毡斑块,而非该分子的可溶性、不可见形式。