Kornberger E, Schwarz B, Lindner K H, Mair P
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Innsbruck, School of Medicine, Austria.
Resuscitation. 1999 Jul;41(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00069-6.
Methods of rewarming patients with severe accidental hypothermia remain controversial. This paper reports our experience with the use of forced air rewarming in patients with severe accidental hypothermia and a body core temperature below 30 degrees C. Fifteen hypothermic patients (body core temperature 24-30 degrees C) were successfully treated with forced air rewarming to a body core temperature above 35 degrees C (mean rewarming rate 1.7 degrees C/h, range from 0.7 to 3.4 degrees C/h). An afterdrop phenomenon was not observed in any of the patients. Nine hypothermic patients (group 1) had no prehospital cardiac arrest, all nine were long-term survivors and made a full recovery. Six patients (group 2) had prehospital cardio circulatory arrest with restoration of spontaneous circulation. None of the group 2 patients survived long-term. Group 1 and group 2 patients did not differ in core temperature (26.6+/-1.6 degrees C group 1 and 27.0+/-1.8 degrees C group 2). Group 2 patients needed catecholamine support during rewarming more frequently (83 versus 22%) and had higher lactate levels and lower pH values at all points of observation. In conclusion our preliminary data indicate that forced air rewarming is an efficient and safe method of managing patients with severe accidental hypothermia. The poor outcome of patients with a history of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably due to irreversible ischaemic brain damage in primarily asphyxiated avalanche and near-drowning victims, rather than the consequence of the rewarming method used.
严重意外低温患者的复温方法仍存在争议。本文报告了我们对体温低于30摄氏度的严重意外低温患者使用强制空气复温的经验。15名低温患者(体温24 - 30摄氏度)通过强制空气复温成功治疗至体温高于35摄氏度(平均复温速率1.7摄氏度/小时,范围0.7至3.4摄氏度/小时)。所有患者均未观察到体温后降现象。9名低温患者(第1组)院前未发生心脏骤停,全部9人均长期存活并完全康复。6名患者(第2组)院前发生心肺循环骤停但恢复了自主循环。第2组患者均未长期存活。第1组和第2组患者的核心体温无差异(第1组为26.6±1.6摄氏度,第2组为27.0±1.8摄氏度)。第2组患者在复温期间更频繁地需要儿茶酚胺支持(83%对22%),且在所有观察点乳酸水平更高、pH值更低。总之,我们的初步数据表明,强制空气复温是治疗严重意外低温患者的一种有效且安全的方法。有院前心肺复苏史的患者预后不良可能是由于主要为窒息性雪崩和溺水受害者存在不可逆的缺血性脑损伤,而非所用复温方法的结果。