Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照研究,旨在评估585纳米闪光灯泵浦脉冲染料激光和硅胶片在治疗增生性瘢痕方面的疗效。

Prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study to assess the efficacy of the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser and silicone gel sheeting in hypertrophic scar treatment.

作者信息

Wittenberg G P, Fabian B G, Bogomilsky J L, Schultz L R, Rudner E J, Chaffins M L, Saed G M, Burns R L, Fivenson D P

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol. 1999 Sep;135(9):1049-55. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.9.1049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser and silicone gel sheeting in the treatment of hypertrophic scars in lighter- and darker-skinned patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind, randomized, internally controlled, comparison investigation.

SETTING

Large academic dermatology department.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients with hypertrophic scars (19 completed the laser treatments and 18 completed the silicone gel sheeting treatments).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical measurements included hypertrophic scar blood flow, elasticity, and volume. Patients' subjective complaints of pruritus, pain, and burning were also monitored. Histological assessment of fibrosis, number of telangiectasias, and number of mast cells was performed. Statistically significant improvements in clinical measurements and patients' subjective complaints determined treatment success.

RESULTS

Mean scar duration was 32 months (range, 4 months to 20 years). There was an overall reduction in blood flow, volume, and pruritus over time (P = .001, .02, and .005, respectively). However, no differences were detected among treatment and control groups. There was no reduction in pain or burning (0-40 weeks), elasticity (8-40 weeks), or fibrosis (0-40 weeks, n = 5 biopsies) in the treated or control sections of the scars. Unlike in a previous study, the number of mast cells in the scars was similar to the number of mast cells in healthy skin.

CONCLUSION

Clinical results demonstrate that the improvements in scar sections treated with silicone gel sheeting and pulsed-dye laser were no different than in control sections.

摘要

目的

确定585纳米闪光灯泵浦脉冲染料激光和硅胶片在治疗浅肤色和深肤色患者增生性瘢痕中的疗效。

设计

前瞻性、单盲、随机、自身对照、比较研究。

地点

大型学术性皮肤科。

患者

20例增生性瘢痕患者(19例完成激光治疗,18例完成硅胶片治疗)。

主要观察指标

临床测量包括增生性瘢痕的血流、弹性和体积。还监测了患者关于瘙痒、疼痛和灼痛的主观主诉。进行了纤维化、毛细血管扩张数量和肥大细胞数量的组织学评估。临床测量和患者主观主诉的统计学显著改善决定治疗是否成功。

结果

瘢痕平均持续时间为32个月(范围4个月至20年)。随着时间推移,血流、体积和瘙痒总体上有所减少(P值分别为0.001、0.02和0.005)。然而,治疗组和对照组之间未检测到差异。瘢痕治疗区或对照区在疼痛或灼痛(0至40周)、弹性(8至40周)或纤维化(0至40周,n = 5次活检)方面均未减少。与先前的研究不同,瘢痕中的肥大细胞数量与健康皮肤中的肥大细胞数量相似。

结论

临床结果表明,用硅胶片和脉冲染料激光治疗的瘢痕部分与对照部分的改善情况没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验