White W B
Section of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06032-3940, USA.
Blood Press Monit. 1999 Jun-Aug;4(3-4):181-4.
Since the early 1980s, when Perloff and colleagues published their seminal report on awake ambulatory blood pressure as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, there have been several additional prospective ambulatory blood pressure studies that have been completed in five different countries. The basis for all of these investigations was to assess the predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure as a determinant of either cardiovascular morbidity (typically myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and vascular surgical procedures) or mortality. With the exception of Syst-Eur, all of these studies have been uncontrolled for therapeutic interventions. Typically, the average follow-up period for each trial has been three to nine years. Despite these limitations, all of the studies have shown that ambulatory blood pressure is a far better predictor of cardiovascular events than the standard office or clinic blood pressure. Furthermore, the hypertensive patients whose nocturnal (or sleep) blood pressure remains high (i.e. non-dipper circadian blood pressure profile) have a much worse outcome compared with patients whose nocturnal blood pressure decline is over 10%.
自20世纪80年代初,佩洛夫及其同事发表了关于清醒动态血压作为心血管疾病预后预测指标的开创性报告以来,在五个不同国家又完成了几项额外的前瞻性动态血压研究。所有这些研究的基础都是评估动态血压作为心血管发病率(通常为心肌梗死、脑血管意外和血管外科手术)或死亡率决定因素的预测价值。除了欧洲收缩期高血压试验(Syst-Eur)外,所有这些研究都未对治疗干预进行对照。通常,每个试验的平均随访期为三到九年。尽管存在这些局限性,但所有研究都表明,动态血压比标准的诊室血压或诊所血压更能预测心血管事件。此外,夜间(或睡眠)血压持续偏高(即非勺型昼夜血压模式)的高血压患者与夜间血压下降超过10%的患者相比,预后要差得多。